>We Don’t Need No Steenkin’ Rule of Law

>Courtesy of Balko’s The Agitator comes this piece explaining why the consequences of Obama’s cramdown of Chrysler’s secured creditors go far beyond the auto industry.

Read it all and then pass it on, please.

Only a fool would think that Chrysler’s creditors will be the last to be looted.

One response to “>We Don’t Need No Steenkin’ Rule of Law

  1. >If Obama’s actual stated intention was to destroy the US, how would his actions as Electee be any different than they are now?