>Repost: Reynolds on Out-of-Doors Political Activity

>From 2009:

Having previously commented on the efficacy of political violence, Professor Reynolds discusses the utility of lesser steps along the action continuum:

WRITTEN IN THE PAST ABOUT “OUT-OF-DOORS POLITICAL ACTIVITY,” and that’s led to some reader questions about what it might involve today.

As I’ve suggested, I think an early phase is internet satire. Tea Party protests are another. Or pranks.

But what if you’re in the Hugo Chavez world — not quite outright military government, but not exactly democracy, either? Or just afraid you’re moving that way?

One step going beyond mere protests and mockery, but well short of violence, is something like the U.K. fuel protests. Or what would happen if a lot of people showed up at banks and started withdrawing a lot of cash all at once? (Most banks couldn’t deal with much in the way of cash withdrawals — a few dozen people withdrawing a few thousand each at once would overload many, no doubt panicking the powers-that-be). Heck just a bunch of people driving at exactly the speed limit might have a drastic effect on some areas . . . .

I don’t have any answers, and we’re pretty clearly not at that point yet. At any rate, I’d encourage those interested in this to read Pauline Maier’s book. We’re not in colonial times any more, but while the specifics might change the principles are evergreen.
Withdraw your consent.

Encourage others to do the same.

Prepare to stand.

One response to “>Repost: Reynolds on Out-of-Doors Political Activity

  1. >I'm in California and already drive the speed limit, as do a lot of others. http://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/downchart_gr.php?year=1992_2015&view=1&expand=&units=b&fy=fy11&chart=F0-total_H0-total&bar=1&stack=1&size=m&title=&state=CA&color=c&local=sTheir concern for traffic safety is proportional to the depth of the budget deficit chasm.