Barnhardt: Permanently Disqualified From Everything

From Ann Barnhardt:


This was originally penned and posted on January 24, AD 2011. I have to re-post it every so often when I start getting a bunch of emails from people telling me how I just HAVE to run for office.

Um, no.

Nopety, nopety, NO.

Funny story. After I originally went viral after my verbal evisceration of Lindsey Graham and bacon bookmarked koran burning (available on my YouTube channel), some nutty woman who was apparently a Lindsey Graham groupie (we pause now and pray for anyone pathetic enough to be a “groupie”, much less a groupie for Lindsey Graham, bless her heart), in an effort to demonize me after I rhetorically flayed her Lindsey, found this essay of mine that had been syndicated on a few sites on the web. She breathlessly posted quotes from it trying to discredit me with it.

Yeah, funny thing about people with a shred of integrity – THEY MEAN WHAT THEY SAY, AND WALK NOTHING BACK. I reposted this essay immediately at that time, and I got questions about it on radio interviews that I did in the aftermath of the koran burning, which I answered GLEEFULLY.

Do you see why I could never be a politician? Politicians are liars and don’t actually say what they mean. Further, whenever their “positions” become politically unpopular (read DETRIMENTAL TO CASH FLOW), they change their “positions”, or walk their positions back, or if you’re Mitt Romney, you just lie like a rug.

The 19th Amendment has been a civilizational disaster. I meant it then, and I mean it now, and my position won’t be changing.


I received a call from the one (and we hope it is ONLY one) Obama-loving cattleman in the country. What a delightful conversation. According to this guy the solution to every problem is NOT to fix the problem itself, but to make it infinitely worse by imposing Marxist rule. For example, the solution to the problem of people freeloading on the healthcare industry is NOT private charity, charitably endowed hospitals, reducing healthcare costs by fostering competition, both among healthcare providers AND among insurance companies, capping malpractice awards, or enforcing the rule of law vis-a-vis immigration.

No. The solution is to completely destroy the insurance industry AND the health care industry so that no one gets any healthcare at all.

Don’t actually solve the problem. Make it infinitely worse and impose Marxist tyranny at the same time.

And according to this guy the best way to deal with the $700 billion dollar deficit created by George W. Bush, which was the most horrible thing any person ever did in the history of the world, was for Obama to burn through an additional FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS in two years – which was AWESOME. That’s right. Don’t actually solve the problem. Make it infinitely worse and impose Marxist tyranny at the same time.

Like I said, this was a DELIGHTFUL conversation.

But here’s what I wanted to share with you – and this will be of particular interest to all of you readers who only read me because you hate me so much. I know you’re out there, and remember, the first step out of addiction is to admit that you have a problem. You all will want to screen capture this, or PDF it and save it on a thumb drive which you then bury in a mayonaisse jar. This post will absolutely, positively disqualify me from ANY public position or office anywhere on earth for the duration of my life aside from self-employment.

Mr. Cowbama and I were talking about the evil of government regulation and how it almost always does far more harm than good when Mr. Cowbama thought he had me in a check-mate. He smugly said, “So you think the 19th amendment should be repealed, then? You think giving women the right to vote was a bad thing?”

Quoth I in retort,

“Oh, HELL yes.”

Mr. Cowbama wasn’t expecting that!

Will it ever happen? Nope. But it sure is fun to dream. Do you know when things really started to go – literally – to hell in this country? When women were given the right to vote seperate and apart from their husbands. What a flipping disaster. This is when the war against marriage and the family began in earnest – and it has taken less than 100 years for both institutions to be almost completely destroyed.

And it all started with the damn suffrage.

Here’s the deal. Up until women’s suffrage, a man was the head of his marriage and his household, and his vote represented not just himself but his entire family, including his wife and his children. When men voted, they were conscious of the fact that they were voting not just for themselves and their own personal interests, but they were also charged with the responsibility of discerning and making the ultimate decision about what was in the best interests of their entire family.

Wow. Isn’t that nuts?

Men being . . . responsible?


As soon as the 19th amendment was passed, men were effectively castrated, and in many, many cases disenfranchised by their wives. No longer was the man the head of the household. No longer was he responsible for his wife. Now the wife was a “co-husband” at best, or a flat-out adversary at worst. The notion of a man making the final decision about what was best for his wife and family per his God-given vocation as husband and father was now over.

Now all he was good for was bringing home the bacon – but even that wouldn’t last.

Women are made with a healthy, innate desire to be provided for and protected. I know this because I am a woman, despite the pair of enormous brass balls I have to carry around. Those are merely an anomaly. Please ignore them, and no, you may not touch them. I just polished them last night.

Back to the point, women want someone or someTHING to take care of them. For this reason, women tend to lean socialist, and are generally in favor of the expansion of government when the government promises to “provide” for them.

If you have read me for any length of time you could probably write this next paragraph yourself. Satan has used this healthy feminine dynamic, perverted by suffrage, to systematically replace men with the government as the providers in society. A woman no longer has any need of a man. Marriage no longer serves any practical purpose. A woman can whore around and have as many fatherless children as she pleases, and Pimp Daddy Government will always be there to provide. Men have learned well from this, too. Men can also slut it up to their heart’s content knowing that the government will take care of their “women” and raise their children for them. Fathering children no longer binds a man to a woman in any way.

Men didn’t vote to societally castrate themselves, and never would have. No – in order for this system to have come about, women’s suffrage was an absolute necessity. Women themselves voted the system into place which objectifies and devalues both them AND their children.

Next, the issue of disenfranchisement. I believe that the 19th amendment actually DISenfranchised more people than it enfranchised. Many, many married couples quickly found themselves voting against one another. The man would tend to vote for the more conservative platform, and the woman would vote for the more socialist platform.

When this happened, the effective result was the nullification of BOTH individuals’ votes. What this did was massively reduce the voting influence of the married household, and magnify the voting influence of the unmarried – and the unmarried tend to be younger, and thus more stupid, and thus vote for big government. It was all part of the plan, kids. All part of the plan.

I’ve probably ticked even one or two of you conservatives off with this post. Here is the question I would ask you: Why? Why are you ticked off? If you’re a woman, the reason you are ticked off is because you put yourself and your desire to assert your will above the well-being of society in general.

I don’t feel that way.

I would give up my vote in a HEARTBEAT if it meant that right-ordered marriage, family and sexuality was restored to our culture. I would rather that my little female namesakes grow up in a world where they did not have the right to vote, but were treated with dignity and respect, were addressed as “ma’am”, had doors held for them, and wherein men stood up when they entered the room. I would rather they be courted properly and then marry men who would never, ever leave them, and would consider it their sacred duty and honor to protect and provide for their wives and their children because he LOVED them.

Oh, HELL yes. I’ll give up my vote in exchange for that any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Why wouldn’t you?

For you men who don’t like my position, you’re just a slave to political correctness. It’s the same thing as the rap music. No one will criticize rap music because it is forbidden by the P.C. culture to criticize a non-white cultural phenomenon. To do so is “bigoted”. It’s the same with this. The P.C. culture has convinced you that if you criticize anything that has to do with women or the feminine culture that you must be a Taliban.

Don’t fall for that garbage. That manipulation is why fifty million babies have been murdered in this country over the last 38 years. Men knew that abortion was murder, but they punted on it and eventually legalized it because they didn’t want to be accused of being “misogynistic”.


So there you go.

Print it, save it, PDF it.

Because I acknowledge the reality and consequence of female suffrage, am able to see beyond my own immediate self-interests on the matter, and have the stones to say it all publically, I am permanently disqualified from . . . pretty much everything outside self-employment.

What a world.

26 responses to “Barnhardt: Permanently Disqualified From Everything

  1. Pingback: Perverting the desire of someone to take care of them… | Battlefield USA

  2. I can’t thing of anything I could add to that, except that I agree, and that I don’t dislike Ann because of her position. YMMV. But, she is clearly right. It is, of course, also the right of anyone to disagree, but logically, what she says is true. Thank G*d for a little clarity and truth now and then.

  3. All that ever needs to be said on the matter. What a gal!

  4. Ann is right on- and illustrates the strategy of the statists to eviscerate the American family (speaking in the natural and Biblically intended sense) in exquisitely painful detail. Interesting how the most visceral of these components were instituted at the same time by the same group of folks….

  5. Some where on the net you can find an interview where David Rockefeller admits that his family funded womans suffrage in order to destroy the family unit. Here is a partial list of groups they fund today…Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF) —
    Recipients of RFF philanthropy include: the Tides Foundation; the Tides Center; the Ms. Foundation for Women: the National Organization for Women Legal Defense and Education Fund; Alliance For Justice; the Union of Concerned Scientists; the People for the American Way Action Fund; the American Civil Liberties Union’s Women’s Rights Project; the Sierra Club; Friends of the Earth; the NARAL Pro-Choice America, — and on and on and on.

  6. Thank you again and big YOU GO GIRL from an old grandpa.

  7. alan w. mullenax

    One of the darkest days for the Republic and a triumph for Socialism was the day that women were given the right to vote.

  8. I recall a video on YouTube a while back, where someone did an experiment on a college campus. The theme was, “Repeal women’s suffrage”.
    With the idiots we have in our colleges, there was some pretty funny footage.

  9. Yep she is right and we are *!#%&$ ^, simple math.

  10. Nope, she’s got it wrong. Much of what ails the Republic antedates the 19th Amendment, passed in 1920.

    Militia Act of 1903 — gutted the existing militia system, and brought the militia fully under the federal thumb
    Election of Woodrow Wilson — 1912 — ushers in the largest expansion in federal government powers since Lincoln
    16th Amendment — 1913 — establishes the income tax system, providing the federal government with an incalculable source of revenue and removing a funding limit to federal action
    17th Amendment — direct election of Senators — 1913.
    Federal Reserve Act — 1913
    Re-election of Woodrow Wilson — 1916 — provided Progressives with the political capital to intervene in WWI, create what came to be known as a “War Economy” which would become the model for the corporatist state in which we now live.

    Barnhardt wants a scapegoat, but women’s suffrage is not it. Even if you repeal the 19th Amendment, the malady which took root in the late nineteenth century would continue to manifest itself.

    • You are of course correct in pointing out that there were other wounds inflicted to the foundations of the Republic. However, the 19th Amendment allowed the fatal wound to be delivered in the form of a womans natural inclination to find a provider no matter who it is and what the collateral damage may be. It is a death by a thousand paper-cuts.


  11. Mt Top Patriot

    Go Ms. Barnhardt! You go Woman!
    You sure are beautiful right down to the bottom of your soul.

  12. “…Do you know when things really started to go – literally – to hell in this country? When women were given the right to vote separate and apart from their husbands….”
    Wow! Truly a woman of God.
    Just guessin’, I’ll bet she can pick a fly off the wall at 200 yards…

  13. indyjonesouthere

    Ms Barnhardt has it pegged. And ours is not the only republic to suffer the consequences of the female vote. The 700 year old republic of Switzerland has in the last generation given the vote to women. And the payoff….now women and metrosexuals want exemptions for military service and just in the last month or so a womens magazine and a womens group lobbied long and hard and unfortunately sucessfully for those with weopons to need permits to buy ammunition. Yup, you can have a state furnished weopon but you can’t get ammunition unless you are properly approved. Now WTF is so hard to understand that women would rather have government provide than an individual man provide for them. Selling liberty to acquire security and getting neither…exactly what is deserved. Have women never heard of depressions or the blind hate of socialists starving out the opposition? Women will be properly rewarded for this shit.

    • “Now WTF is so hard to understand that women would rather have government provide than an individual man provide for them.”

      The answer to that is easy.
      The degenerate nature of mankind after the fall. Read Ann’s article through again. A main point was degenerate morality. Get it?

      Add to that a national government composed of mercantile pack of congress critters.

      Since all the critters want is to be elected to cushy ‘jobs’ and then re-elected when they truly discover just how lucrative that national position is, they’ll promise whatever is required by appealing to that degenerate morality..

  14. No votes for women? That makes no sense. What about the educated, thoughtful females out there who support liberty and free enterprise(not the Mittens/Barry Faux News crony capitalism)? Would you deny sufferage to Ayn Rand? Would you deny it to Ms. Barnhardt?
    It has been pointed out by numerous contributors to this website that the demise of our Republic can be traced back to Alexander Hamilton and the Banksters. It was continued by Lincoln and the Mercantilists. The final nails in the coffin were hammered in by Wilson, the FED, and the 16th&17th Amendments.
    Regardless of the thoughtful debate about Womens’ Sufferage, it is moot at this point. Things cannot be fixed. We will, at best, end up like Argentina or at worst, like the former Yugoslavia during the 90’s. Get prepped. And, make sure your womenfolk know how to handle a firearm.

    • The 30% of women that vote for less government are not the same 30% each time there’s an election, there is no predicting who and what they’re liable to support.

      Also, remember, that prohibition, of all types, was supported by the same progressives that put forward Woodrow Wilson and supported the 13th, 16th, and 17th Amendments.

      All supported by voting women at about the 65-70% level.

  15. God bless you Ann. Spot on again.

  16. Ann counters a newer politically-correct answer about how much of a legal adult a woman should be with an older politically-correct answer. Both answers seek to be politically correct, not true.

    If the “this country fell apart when woman got the vote” answer was true, than you would expect competing patriarchal countries to have done noticeably better. Countries like Russia and China and Germany. All of which had genocides.

    Women tend to lean socialist, yeah right. Plenty of socialism by men in the 5,000 years prior to the 19th amendment. Plenty of repeats where men vote for government to make impossible gun and butter promises, then go bust in a crash. Portugal, Spain, Netherlands, France, Britain, all had reserve currency status for about 200 years then went bust, women voted in none of them.

    I think women getting the vote changed nothing at all. All those claims about how women would end war to save the lives of their children turned out false.

  17. There’s that damn lumpy white blouse again.

  18. In a gut, Biblical, natural truth-kind of way, I agree with Ann. But I was doing some thinking. Do I want a government powerful enough that it would make any difference if a woman could vote or not? Hell no I don’t! And thats the way we should all be thinking. If we allow a government to tell us who can and who can’t vote — what else can they tell us to do or force upon us. I want a government that does one thing — protects my rights to own property, own my labor, and own my life (and in every aspect of it). All the problems start when we allow a government to have any power OVER us at all. Its sole purpose should be defending our freedoms, from rogue citizens, foreign attackers, as well as rogue domestic government agencies.

    Note: Citizen Militia ONLY- no standing army or militarized agency including police.

  19. I’ve enjoyed the position put forth in Starship Troopers that surviving Military Veterans ought to have the ability to call themselves Citizen, and Vote. Franchise merely by being born male? I’ve this week seen men who are more girly than many sturdy functional females, and these men are not even “out”. Let them work, pay taxes and have children, while being protected by the State. They have “human rights” and they have privileges under the law, but changing the law isn’t something they can force, or would bother to. Their chains are downy and soft, with narcotic comforts.

    Maybe their children will be dissatisfied with being limited like that and take a chance at something.

  20. I am reminded of a headline from the parody newspaper The Onion.

    “Woman gets the vote. Voting power of every married man doubles!”

  21. MY family has destroyed it self,no longer is there a unit ,because the women wanted to run everything and now,theres nothing to run,AMERICA has changed course,its headed stright into the trash can of history and will end soon……….THANKS GIRLS….you finaly got what you wanted…………………….

  22. There is a problem with this…and its that you are trying to legislate a right spirit in the home. It cannot be done. My mom for example wa the quintessential 50s housewife, and her husband left her thanks to too much booze and too many women. Six living children, one of which only half alive, severely disabled. She never had welfare for her family even, pride, and we survived. It was not pretty. If my mother would have left the guy many children earlier due to his issues rather than waiting for him to leave her, and had a career to fall back on… I am not sure my mom ever knew women got the right to vote……

    SO what is my point? I think equal right for women is a must because men are not always who they should be. That is something you cannot legislate. Men can be hard hearted and addicted and not care if their women and children suffer. I also think a right spirit does not need an absence of legal rights to operate. We can choose to be a family unit and choose Gods way on things. It should not require political or legal enslavement or its not a right spirit anyway. Woman through subtile deception ruled the world long before the governmnet gave them the right to anyway. Men are blind to this manipulation all too often, as any mother knows who has a son married to a woman who only likes to spend time with her family of origin, or her friends. That required no legislation, but how many men follow along. No I do not have a son like this, but I have brother and uncles, I see it all the time and I also see woman who try to encourage their men to keep in touch. So when are men going to be men and not children?. Can you legislate that?

  23. Pingback: Barnhardt: Permanently Disqualified From Everything | Western Rifle Shooters Association « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL