Taking Back The “Militia” Word

wpid-IMG_1207027106082
H/t to HC for this latest mainstream effort by Professor Reynolds in “normalizing” both the Second Amendment and the forbidden word.

Not that schmucks like Sunstein and his ilk will pay any attention.

Screen shot 2014-03-10 at 3.39.33 PM(Banzai!)

9 responses to “Taking Back The “Militia” Word

  1. Some of us have never given up on the “Militia” word, and have suffered 25 years of attacks, arrests, entrapment and deaths as a result. All while neo-cons, conservatives and republicans stood silent or supported the Statists in their efforts to eradicate us.

    And most of us would not give up a minute of our struggle.

  2. Reblogged this on The Lynler Report.

  3. Pingback: Militias Manufacture Liberty

  4. I agree the picture looks threatening … but … with gangs, drug cartels, thousands upon thousands of illegal immigrants in cities across CA and other border states, how does law enforcement fight crime? Remember the shootout at the LA Bank of America before cops had automatic weapons? Judicious use yes but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. I don’t just take this as a threat to law biding citizens but what are you gonna do to deal with the dark side?

    • Are you kidding? The very threats you cite are exactly what the posse (a form of militia) and actual militias were intended to deal with. There would be a whole lot less of those things if the people had to muster every time the sheriff or town constable was in over his head. It’s easy to be soft on gangs and illegals when you farm out your law enforcement to mercenaries with badges.

  5. Seriously?

    … with gangs, drug cartels, thousands upon thousands of illegal immigrants in cities across CA and other border states, how does law enforcement fight crime?

    Pablo and Jose at Home Depot are not toting RPGs and AKs. So if the Feds would simply secure the border and put an end to sanctuary cities and deny welfare to illegals they would self deport.
    Remember the shootout at the LA Bank of America before cops had automatic weapons?

    Yeah, I do. It was madness. Like Baghdad. Even smaller towns were plagued with full auto toting drug dealers who were gunning down kids and women and dogs. Oh, wait. No that’s not true. It’s the cops today that are recklessly gunning down innocents.

    I don’t just take this as a threat to law biding citizens but what are you gonna do to deal with the dark side?

    What are you gonna do when the law changes to ensnare YOU? When YOU are deemed the dark side.
    Wake up.

  6. Did you notice that the armored vehicle is in Salinas? Whoop dee do! Yeah, I guess honest Americans in Salinas of all places really have their liberties in danger. I would put my money on crime or maybe sheer stupidity of a police dept. so flush with money they just don’t know what to do with it. Listen, I am not a johnny come lately to the party here but there is still a job to be done protecting people from crime. As for being on the dark side, you don’t want to know … he he he

    • As demonstrated by the Birmingham boys cited elsewhere today.

    • “…but there is still a job to be done protecting people from crime.”

      So protect them, but that’s got NOTHING to do with what’s going on in this country currently. It’s the root lie–not by you but by our “thought leaders”–that is the single biggest excuse for ENGAGING in crime.

      Don’t buy into it, and understand that no petty thief or crackhead is going to either outwit or overpower you. At least not if you’re free, they won’t.

      OTOH if you subsidize their upbringing and have an industrial complex built exclusively of their existence and success, then they might.