Bracken: The Islamic Jihad Conquest Formula


The Islamic Jihad Conquest Formula

By Matthew Bracken

August, 2014

Mohammed’s unchanging formula for conquest is time-proven; variations were also used in history by the invading Mongol hordes among others. Emissaries ride forward of their advancing armies, offering to spare the lives of the targeted population in return for their unconditional surrender and explicit submission to their new rulers. In the Islamic context this submission is exemplified by the fresh converts repeating the Shahada prayer before Muslim witnesses.

There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his messenger.

The Shahada prayer is the first of the Five Pillars of Islam. The Shahada prayer is also what is written on the black battle flags of Islamic jihad. Along with Allahu Akbar—our God is greatest—the Shahada is the battle cry of advancing Islamic armies. In fact, the very word Islam means submission, and not peace, as it is often intentionally mistranslated by duplicitous Muslims practicing taqiya, or sanctified lying for the cause of advancing the spread of Islam.

It’s purposefully made very easy for a town or a city to submit and convert to Islam. But the entire city must surrender without posing any resistance at all. In the event of any violent or even physical resistance, a new formula applies: the Islamic jihad conquest formula. From the time of Mohammed until today—as we are seeing in the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq—the formula has not changed.

1. During the battle and immediately afterward, there is a period of unbelievable savagery and wanton hyperviolence.

Any of the defeated population from infants to grandmothers may be subjected to the most extreme cruelty, including beheading with knives or swords, crucifixion, being burned or buried alive, or thrown down wells or off cliffs or high walls. During this period, women, girls and boys are routinely gang-raped by frenzied jihadists, to the point that survivors almost always suffer lifelong crippling internal and external injuries. Suicide among the survivors of these savage gang rapes is common. The Christian and Zahidi girls and boys in Northern Iraq are only the most recent victims of this traditional Muslim depraved cruelty.

Those who survive until the victorious jihadists have consolidated their hold and sated their blood-lusts are the fortunate ones. They may have caught a potential protector’s eye, or hidden themselves until the jihadists’ most bloodthirsty passions have subsided. No jihadists will ever be called to account by Muslim jihad leaders for their atrocities committed during the battle and victory consolidation phase.

For the first time in history, today we are seeing what the previous millions of victims of Muslim conquests have experienced for 1,400 years. The recent beheadings and crucifixions in Syria and Iraq are not new or novel. What is new and novel is that today these Muslim jihad atrocities are being filmed and transmitted for the purpose of spreading the propaganda of Islamic State terror, to encourage their next intended targets to submit and surrender without resistance.

2. Captured men will be beheaded, shot or enslaved.

Following a fresh conquest, when the defeated men are tied up, imprisoned, or held under the barrels of Muslim guns, they may either be murdered or enslaved. Their fate depends upon the tactical situation and the best advantage as perceived by the victors. If the Muslim victory is thought to be temporary, the jihadists will immediately murder all of the men and boys over the age of twelve, eliminating them as future threats. They may be beheaded if there is sufficient time, otherwise they will be shot in ditches as we have recently seen in Iraq. The heads of the decapitated will be stuck on poles, fences or walls as a gruesome public warning against further resistance by the living.

If the latest jihad victory is thought to be secure and slave labor is desired, the captured men and boys will be fettered in chains and put to work under conditions similar to those experienced by slave laborers under the Nazis during World War Two. They may be fed or starved at the sole discretion of their new overlords. They may be worked fifteen or more hours a day, every day, in all weather and climates with no shoes, gloves, coats or hats. Often they will be both starved and overworked to the extent that a significant percentage of them will perish every month. When these wretched slaves are too weak to haul boulders or dig trenches, they may be executed at the sole discretion of their overlords. No discipline will ever be meted out for starving, beating or killing “infidel” slave laborers.

3. Women and teenage girls will be kidnapped as sex-slaves, to be sold at auction to the highest bidders.

The prettier young women and girls will be fortunate to become the concubine of one powerful man. The plainer women and girls will be sold as house or field slaves, doing fifteen or more hours of hard work every remaining day of their lives: hauling water, cleaning floors, cooking and so on. They may be raped, starved, beaten or killed at the whim of their owners. They may be subjected to forced female genital mutilation—the razor-blade excision of their clitoris and other horrors—depending on the whims of their new masters. No discipline will ever be applied to their masters. They are chattel property with no rights at all.

4. Children younger than twelve will be kidnapped and raised under Sharia law by the very men who murdered or enslaved their parents.

Girls may be assigned to the victors or sold off as future house slaves, beginning their arduous life of toil as soon as they are able to gather firewood or haul water, often by the age of seven or eight. Young girls showing the promise of becoming pretty teenagers may be assigned to harems for sex-slave indoctrination. At the whim of their owners, the luckiest might even be adopted and raised as family members. From starvation, beatings and overwork, to being assigned to a harem as a sex-slave, to being adopted and raised in some comfort, the relative misery of the kidnapped and enslaved girls will be entirely up to their new masters.

The young kidnapped boys will be sent to madrasa schools to memorize the Koran by repetitiously chanting it, in order to become fully brainwashed Islamic killer zombies as adults. Perhaps most perversely cruel, in time they may join with the murderers and enslavers of their very own forgotten parents, while engaged upon new missions of Islamic jihad conquest. Black slave boys from sub-Saharan Africa will routinely be castrated, turning them into placid adult eunuch slaves.

5. Conquered property will be looted as legitimate war booty.

Buildings and homes will be occupied by the victorious jihadists after the murder or enslavement of their former owners. Any moveable property will be stolen by the victors. Concealed money, jewelry or other valuables will be found by serially torturing family members until someone breaks and reveals the hiding place. This looting, like the rape and murder of enemies in battle, is fully sanctioned by Mohammed’s Sharia Law. This is nothing more than the worst kind of piracy codified into practice and called a “religion.”

It is worth noting that before Mohammed descended into the desert cave to hear the messages of Allah, he was an actual desert pirate, falling upon caravans and plundering them—after beheading the men, and raping and enslaving the women. He later applied the same formula to conquer the Arabian deserts in the name of Allah. If it was good enough for Mohammed, Islam’s perfect man, then it is good enough for any believing Muslim, then, now or in the future. Thus the Islamic jihad conquest formula is unchangeable and Islam can never be reformed. Would-be reformers are beheaded as apostates to true Koranic Islam.

6. The promised Islamic reward for dying in jihad is a perpetual orgy in “paradise” with 72 virgins.

For impoverished Muslim men with little hope of finding a women to marry during their earthly lives, this is a strong inducement to engage in violent jihad. If they are victorious in jihad, they might capture, rape and enslave actual living, breathing infidel girls (and boys). If they die while engaging in jihad, they are vaulted to the front of the line into paradise, and immediately obtain their 72 virgins. This is why suicide bombers often rush toward their “infidel” enemies to blow themselves up: they are convinced that their perpetual orgy will begin the instant after their self-detonation. The Islamic promise of 72 virgins in “paradise” means that jihad is a win-win proposition for a fervent Muslim man. They may well enjoy their jihad rape-fest in this world, but if not, they will enjoy it in the next world immediately following their violent jihad deaths.

7. The Black Flag of Jihad has been the battle flag of Islam from the time of Mohammed until today.

The Saudi Arabian flag also carries the Shahada prayer, but on a green field, indicating that the home of Mecca is part of the Dar al Islam, or House of Submission. Outside of nations living under Sharia Law, in the Dar al Harb, or House of War, Muslims fly the Black Flag of Jihad to indicate their clear intention to violently force that country to submit to Islam.

Islam began with a cruel desert pirate named Mohammed, and it soon took to the seas. In the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Flag of Jihad was simplified to show only a scimitar sword or an arm holding a scimitar, indicating to the crew of the “infidel” ship being attacked their simple choice: surrender and submit to Islam, or face beheading at worst, or enslavement at best.

During the Corsair era, lasting into the 19th Century, many captured Europeans chose to convert to Islam by repeating the Shahada prayer, rather than to be killed or enslaved. Many of these “renegade” Europeans even signed on as crew aboard Muslim pirate vessels, some even rising to the rank of corsair captain. Islam is always welcoming of converts, and under Islam what we call piracy is fully sanctioned as “sea jihad.” Some of these European converts-of-convenience to Islam later escaped and took up piracy on their own accounts. The Black Flag of Jihad was the origin of the familiar non-Muslim black pirate flags, borrowing its fearsome reputation to cow and terrorize targeted ships into surrendering without resistance.

Simply put, the Black Flag of Jihad is the black pirate flag of an evil pirate “religion.”

8. The lure of capturing male and female slaves and obtaining other forms of loot and plunder is the Islamic jihad conquest formula.

Average men in polygamous Muslim societies have little hope of obtaining a wife, not when the wealthy and powerful already have several wives apiece. Jihad offers ordinary Muslims a chance to obtain wives or sex-slave concubines by force in battle, or 72 virgins in the afterlife. Jihad also offers poor Muslims a chance to obtain a home and other forms of wealth by force, as we are seeing today in Iraq.

Unlike Christianity with its Golden Rule, Islam has always appealed to the worst desires of evil men, and the most ruthlessly evil men, like its originator Mohammed, are its greatest beneficiaries. Normal human beings ask the question: what kind of a sick and twisted so-called “religion” promises its highest rewards in exchange for engaging in organized looting, mass murder, mass rape, torture and slavery in the name of its god? Only Islam, which has been an insane rape and murder cult since Mohammed crawled out of the bat cave and barked at the crescent moon.

Moses and Jesus are reported to have climbed to the tops of high mountains to communicate with God. Just who was whispering the gospel of plunder, rape and murder into Mohammed’s ear, deep under the surface of the earth in that dark Saudi Arabian cave?

Who taught Mohammed the Islamic jihad conquest formula?

UPDATE 2245 EDT 20 AUG 2014: Bracken sends this addendum:

This was a good question on the Free Republic thread about my essay,“The Islamic Jihad Conquest Formula.” The question and my answer should be included as an afterword to the essay.

Q: The case has been made, even by some conservatives, that the Moorish period in Spain was a golden period. Jews and Christians were treated with tolerance, but the Spanish people that pushed out the Moors, treated them with contempt and intolerance. I wonder, is this revisionism, or is there some truth to it?

A. Under Islam there have been varying high and low periods, also varying from place to place. For example, under the rule of Sultan Mulay Ismail in 18th Century Morocco, the hard labor was all done by black and white slaves who perished in droves in extreme misery, under conditions like those experienced by Jews under the Nazis. He was a Hitler who survived as absolute ruler for more than 60 years. Great miles-long palaces were built on the bones of slave labor.

Or an absolute ruler might turn out to be a gem, an enlightened gentleman for the age, yes, that happened and the hard edge of Sharia was sometimes blunted. But always and every time, in every century, the end of a ruler meant the high chance of a bloodbath, and the next ruler could be a blood brother of Mohammed, or al Queda, or IS.

It is always a danger that this 7th Century fanaticism will break out, it has happened over and over through history. Islam cannot have a reformation that “sticks” beyond an enlightened ruler or two, because there are always determined mullahs of the Khomeini or Bagdadi stripe ready to grab power as the new Sultan or even Caliph. Bagdadi is merely the latest in a long line. Eruptions of 7th Century fervor are always a risk in Islam.

I’ll give you a real world example. Morocco is presently very politely Westernized, insofar as any Muslim country can be. The hip young king even married a red-headed Berber wife who looks like Maureen O’Sullivan, God help me. She appears with him in Western dresses with flowing tresses. He is making a point. One wife, hair out, shoulders in dress like Paris. It is a signal, one of many. Surfers from Europe flock to Moroccan waves, tourists flock along the promenades. European bathing suits and customs are tolerated along the beach strips. You can buy wine and beer at shops run by Christians, near the beaches.

But brother, it could turn on a dime, and the enlightened king can be beheaded and replaced by a spiritual brother of Bagdadi, swearing allegiance to the new IS caliphate. Don’t rule it out, ever. Every century or two there is a new self-proclaimed Mahdi. Bagdadi is calling himself the Caliph, and all must swear loyalty to him. The black flag with the white ball logo is his personal mark, to distinguish it from generic Al Queda or Hamas black flag with the shahada all on one line.

Islam is unreformable. Its unchangeable blueprint–the Koran–always gives a handle to maniacs who can recruit armies of brainwashed killer zombie mutant humanoids.

182 responses to “Bracken: The Islamic Jihad Conquest Formula

  1. I can’t help be think the word “extermination” is appropriate here. THAT disturbs me, considering I’m an American and still believe we’re the guys in the white hats. I’m conflicted AND enraged. I just know it’ll be nice when we have a president again who possesses a spine.

    • Not convinced you can fight this with bombs. Hasn’t worked, so far, has it? In fact, Islam has become stronger … and it’s everywhere. Gonna bomb London, too?

      Islam is a powerful concept; a bunch of ideas that clearly appeal to many, many people. It can only be defeated by a bunch of BETTER ideas.

      Individual Liberty… the very thing which is not on the agenda of any Western government.

      • Nope, better “ideas” won’t defeat Islam. You don’t see any Islamic nation moving towards our better ideas. Partly because Islam is a “religion” of violence (not of peace) and so the ones that are willing to be violent will stop those (if any) that want to move towards our “better” ideas.

        “Better ideas” won’t stop IS (or ISIS, or ISIL, whatever they call themselves now). They clearly are willing to commit extreme violence to advance their desires, which they think are better ideas.

        Killing them is the only way to stop them from doing violence to others (and you) which is what they do to advance their agenda.

  2. I penned this answer to Islam in the US way back in 2007 –

    read it all, but here is a portion of it –

    “Article I

    The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion.

    The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.

    . . . .

    Article III

    Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.

    The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.”

    of course I was attacked as a vicious xenophobe for it. but I was right then, I’m still right.

  3. Keep your powder dry and a watchful eye upon the horizion. A great storm is brewing .Don,t get caught with your pants down. Prepare while you still can. Like the guy who bought the fire extinguisher he hopes he never has to use it. But if he does its nice to know you do have it.

  4. Reblogged this on The Biblical False Prophet Has Arrived and commented:
    Have a look at one secular view of how a religion of Antichrist spreads – through butchery, violence, slavery and sexual immorality. Remember, this is only a warm-up to ‘the’ religion of the Antichrist.

  5. Displacement activity … if you fear to face the real threat, you just might lash out at something less dangerous.

    Pretty much what the residents of Ferguson just did, when they trashed their own community, rather than killing the people who were oppressing them.

    Bullied at work? … go home and take it out on your wife.

    I think that there’s a parallel to be drawn. You get the idea.

  6. TheObserver

    Perhaps a more pertinent question would be to ask how long before Washington DC or NYC is a smoking radioactive ruin? What these people are is a settled issue. What they want to do is the same. Only a matter of when.

    Prepare accordingly.

  7. Pingback: Success, Adversity & Sandcastles | shutupnsing

  8. Johnthejedi

    As I’ve stated on a number of other forums Im a member of, if even 1% of 1% of Muslims are Jihadi/Islamist material that still leaves totals in the high hundreds of thousands to a million+.

    Considering that I think there is maybe 10-50 times that number who are capable of being radicals while 5 times that who support them, are we in the West prepared for conflict with them and their descendents for the remainder of this century and into the next?

    Do we have the balls to bring the kind of death and destruction on people not seen since WW2?

  9. Hi, I’m new here and found your blog via the following comment at

    My comment is in reply to your statement:

    In the Islamic context this submission is exemplified by the fresh converts repeating the Shahada prayer

    You are correct, but the only thing I would add for clarification is that the Shahada is repeated in Arabic, and you are merely showing the English translation of what the convert would say in Arabic.

    But, even more importantly, we need to take very seriously the FACT that Barack Hussein Obama has repeated those very words in Arabic.

    Far too few Americans understand that Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada!

    And his wife’s trip to Spain was not “tone-deaf”, it was pitch-perfect to the Cordoba Initiative…

  10. Pingback: Repeat… in your face. (Graphic) | Battlefield USA

  11. Pingback: John McTernan's Insights » The Islamic Jihad Conquest Formula

  12. You see Jon, it’s like this. Curtis is no fan of my philosophy either, but he understands one thing that you don’t. He writes it over and over—Responsibility. That’s all any of this is about, and it’s THE principle you refuse to accept.

    It’s WHY we are where we are. It’s always “someone else” for you. “Someone else” did wrong; “someone else” should do something; “someone else” is the cause of everything. “Someone else” should “administer justice” over in Iraq. Hell man, you’re even talking about people who had nothing to do with who they are. As I wrote, that would be some neat trick.

    It’s WHY Obama was so widely loved. Like you, he’s the Man With No Responsibility. If everyone would just get on the bandwagon, then we’ll all be just so and everything will be peachy…we’ll have the morality that YOU know to be true.

    Of course, for hypocrisy, you manage to outdo even him. You charge ME as “Utopian.” You charge ME with seeking the approval of others. Pretty funny, huh? You do this as you spout Collectivist bullshit about how if everyone would just sacrifice their own ego, then some Great Morality will break out over the Earth. Sounds a little Utopian, huh?

    Oh, I could go on and on and on. But none of it matters, because no matter what I write, you REFUSE to look inside yourself and see that YOU are responsible for YOUR life. Just like the collectivist whites who believe that the blacks are responsible for their problems. Just like the collectivist blacks, who believe that whitey is responsible for their problems. Just like the Muslims, who believe that the non-Muslims are the cause of all evil. Just like collectivists everywhere, who ALWAYS believe it’s someone else, someone else, someone else. It’s never YOU, is it?

    And then, to top it all off, you cite a question—“And where do concepts exist,” and don’t even bother to answer what you yourself cite. Save yourself already, and answer the damn question. WHERE DO CONCEPTS EXIST? Here, I’ll answer it for you—YOUR concepts exist in YOUR mind, as it is for every living person on Earth.

    You don’t want to accept the Responsibility for what you believe? Well, alrighty then. But people are waking up to the FACT of Responsibility, and aren’t going to be taken in by your bullshit collectivist fantasies any longer. So you’re fighting a losing battle in this respect, and the goal should be to WIN.

    Of course, WINNING doesn’t mean very much to someone who doesn’t think he’s worth it, and believes that the Good is to be found outside of himself. I’m not here to be popular and I don’t give a shit whether you like me or not. But this is a damn WAR and I’m out here trying to save lives just as much as any medic or sniper. I do it with the skills that I have and until CA asks me to stop, or I view the job as done, it ain’t gonna stop. So either grow the fuck up and take your lumps like a man or better yet, come to understand the error of your ways. You are asking people to keep doing what’s been done for thousands of years already, and it has never, ever worked over the long haul. As with anything else, there are reasons for that, and I happen to understand those reasons. I don’t seek that ANYONE should be like me, because I understand that no such thing is possible. This is about human life in a SOCIAL context and you’re offering the absurd contention that socially, the best approach is that everyone should have the same morality. That ain’t gonna happen because it CAN’T happen, so quit trying to pretend that it can.

    The battle has ALWAYS been Individualism versus Collectivism. You’re on the losing side, Jon, but you’ll always be welcome with the winners. All you gotta understand is that it’s YOUR choice and YOUR responsibility. Take it and the world is yours, with all it has to offer. Refuse it and you’ll get what you’ve always sought…a tombstone that says, “He sacrificed until the end.”

    Just remember this…there’s no do-over. CHOOSE LIFE; CHOOSE HAPPINESS.

    • I am duly chastised, but not by you.

      It will do no good, but not one thing you wrote about me is true. All you know of me is what I write here, and how you interpret, extrapolate, conflate and construe it, according to the penetrating insights, infallible wisdom and unassailable philosophy of Jim Klein.

      Such arrogant certainty is a trap in itself, Jim. The universe has a way of exceeding your preconceptions and the great edifice and bulwark of your unified field theory of The Self will not be proof against it.

      I am pretty certain you are agnostic or atheistic, and I take no issue with that, but allow me use a spiritual analogy for shorthand:

      The Ego is Satan’s playground.

      • Aw, cut it out. You know what I think of you, cuz I’ve written it plenty. I think you’re a GOOD man, and I KNOW that you strive to be moral.

        You were just hypnotized basically, that’s all. And your last sentence is precisely what you were hypnotized into. Of course it’s not about religion, but it IS about the Ego. Doesn’t your religion say a word or two about Free Will? What do you imagine your free will is, if not the ego?

        The interesting part is why you–and yes, all of us–were scammed like that. It was PRECISELY for what we see…that the very worst among us, the looters and thugs and cheaters, could succeed beyond their wildest imaginations.

        I could use logic galore to show how preposterous your position on the Ego is, but that ain’t gonna work. All I know is that shitloads of people are gonna die, unless GOOD people, like you and me and almost everyone here, wake the fuck up, and quickly.

        Even that wouldn’t drive me so much; you and I are going to die soon enough in any event. It’s just that next time is always worse than the last time, and I shudder to think of the horrors that we’re about to see. ISIS is the prelude to the prelude; imagine what the Main Event will look like.

        So if it makes you feel any better, and if you consider what sorts of consequences I can likely expect for my writing, obviously sacrifice for others isn’t completely out of my repertoire. But the real reason I do it, is because I want to live as the person I wish to be…one that I myself can admire. If everyone would do that, there’d be nobody left to commit the atrocities. Think about it…wouldn’t that be good enough?

    • Regular Old Bob

      Well, Jim, *I* approve of you. 🙂

      Now, I’m not getting in the middle of this shit between two guys that I like and agree with on most counts. To anyone reading this, ignore the personal aspects of Jim’s post, because, applied to most *all* of us, it was good. Even the best of us need to be reminded of those points from time to time.

      And there are one helluva lotta people who need to learn the high points of Jim’s post and TRY to maintain that perspective. It ain’t easy.

      Yes! There ARE externalities! LOTS of them. BUT, there is quite a bit of shit that each of us has brought upon ourselves, as painful as it is to admit that. So, do as I will right now, and review your personal pile of fucked-up shit, assign the responsibility where it BELONGS, and figure out a plan to *realistically* deal with it.

      To Oughtsix:
      Man, your closing analogy flat-out nailed many issues related to what Klein said. In general, the “smarter” *some* people are, the more easily they can justify and trick themselves into doing some really stupid shit. 🙂

      OK, I gotta get back to rubbing bacon grease on the pointy parts of my ammo. Just for AllahY’all FUBAR or whatever …