War Ratchets Another Click Closer

Posted on December 7, 2015 | 29 Comments

zoomie resist

Supremes decline to hear city-based AW ban.

Do you understand yet?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

29 responses to “War Ratchets Another Click Closer”

  1. Kevin 3% | December 7, 2015 at 18:40 |

    This lazy gang of black-robed clowns hears about 7 cases per year. The fact they did not accept this case indicates just how far out of touch they are from reality, from the people and from current events. Pathetic!

      • GS | December 7, 2015 at 21:32 |

        Yes, done on purpose.

        http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/GCA_68.htm

        http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/biography/item/105-the-passing-of-aaron-zelman-founder-of-jpfo

        “In an acerbic letter just 11 days before his death, Zelman wrote “An Open Letter to All American Politicians and Bureaucrats,” noting acidly,
        You have done absolutely nothing effective or meaningful to stop [the erosion of our Second Amendment rights]. A preponderance of the blame can be laid directly at your feet. Why? Because many of you are, unequivocally, deceivers and liars.
        How can I call you liars? Upon your election or appointment here’s what you promised us: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take his obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

        Your oath of office is a contract, both verbal and signed. If you are in breach of that contract you are now both a liar and a criminal….

        What immediate convenience or passing luxury could lure so many of you into your present and insane politically correct points of view? It must be asked: Are you taking bribes? Are you being blackmailed? What is the promise or price being offered to you to so transparently betray America?

        If you don’t change course, how long do you think the American people are going to tolerate your charade of loyalty?”

  2. Z of Doom | December 7, 2015 at 19:21 |

    The 5 million number estimated for ARs is way too low from what I can tell.

  3. 55six | December 7, 2015 at 19:25 |

    Sent you an email CA.

  4. Mike Bishop | December 7, 2015 at 19:31 |

    Just remember…

    The word, “State” is an extremely complicated, nuanced word, whose very meaning is radically subjective…

    …one might even argue that the interpretation of the meaning behind such a complicated word, like, “State” could be the difference between a “penalty” and a “tax.”

    Like David Copperfield, the 9-headed snake can make your rights disappear in the blink of an eye, and they even hold the power to change the essence of words themselves.

    They can rule that 2+2=5, and that the sky is green.

    Oh well. Don’t make no nevermind.

    FUSA, baby!

  5. ensitue | December 7, 2015 at 19:35 |

    I really don’t have a clue, Oh wait the Simpsons are on!
    Dougnuuuts!
    Ha Haaa!
    Now what were you saying?

  6. JFP | December 7, 2015 at 20:25 |

    The Taco Supreme Court strikes again.

  7. Tom | December 7, 2015 at 20:34 |

    Good. Luck. You. Commie. Fucks.

  8. D | December 7, 2015 at 20:54 |

    I realize it makes little difference that at least Thomas blasted the lower court…”If a broad ban on firearms can be upheld based on conjecture that the public might feel safer (while being no safer at all), then the Second Amendment guar- antees nothing.”
    Bravo Clarence, you grok it.

  9. Whynot | December 7, 2015 at 21:02 |

    Just curious if this means municipalities can now ban abortions, allow racial discrimination, legalize murder, legalize theft (sorry that’s already being done)……

  10. JohnMc | December 7, 2015 at 21:14 |

    Actually the best challenge has not arrived for this and it is probably the reason the SCOTUS did not take it up. Understand that Illy already has a State law that prevents munis from banning the possession of firearms. However those munis that already had a ban in place was grandfathered. If the judges took up that case they would run directly into a Federalism buzzsaw without the benefit of the State making its case.

    Illy State court needs to revoke the grandfather clause in the law, have it challenged then provoke appeal to SCOTUS. That way Illy stands in as the defendant rather than the prosecution.

    Or would you rather have Loretta Lynch, the current AG, defending the 2nd Amendment?

    • Concerned American | December 7, 2015 at 21:24 |

      I don’t think the majority is interested in finding the right case to spank the municipalities. Do you have statements by Court members supporting that POV?

      • ExGeeEye | December 8, 2015 at 00:39 |

        Individual statements I don’t, though I will not speak for John. However, we to have the majority opinions in Heller, and the other case whose name escapes me. I would guess, off-hand, that the assenting Justices are more or less favorably inclined to a literal read of the 2nd.

      • JohnMc | December 8, 2015 at 08:22 |

        Honest. No. Because the Court does not have to render a reason for not accepting a cert taking up the case. I am basing on the case law, Heller (5-4), MacDonald (5-4). MacDonald should have settled this matter, as it was the reversal of the 7th Court in a similar manner. The reason I am suggesting the track as offered is that it the case should be offered that it is in a State’s interest that the citizenry be armed as a defense of last resort. States Interest vis a vis the 2nd has not been tested to my knowledge.

  11. cavmedic | December 7, 2015 at 21:49 |

    twitter.com/RepSteveIsrael
    Steve Israel ‏@RepSteveIsrael 5h ago
    If #GOP refuses 2 stop terrorists from buying guns,reduce #GunViolence & protect Americans- House D’s will make them

    Dems try to force vote on ‘no-fly’ list gun limits
    The push is part of a larger messaging campaign the party will deploy this week. By Lauren French 12/07/15 02:08 PM EST Updated 12/07/15 06:37 PM EST
    politico.com/story/2015/12/democrats-gun-control-216494#ixzz3th0RXraX

  12. Jackson | December 7, 2015 at 22:33 |

    Now is the golden era.

    ARs available at handgun prices around here, dozens of makes and models at all the local dealers, both chains and smaller sellers. Stacks of ammo. I bought 500 rounds in a military ammo can, all packed in 10rd stripper clips for under $200. Mags are plentiful, local Cabelas has a whole aisle of them. Not just AR-15, but 20 rd AR-10s and ones for many 22’s as well.

    Give all your friends ammo for Christmas, or magazines. Or loaded magazines! Nothing says “I care” like a pair of full 30 round Magpuls

    • Publius 2015 | December 8, 2015 at 14:44 |

      I have been surprised to notice that prices have remained so low despite what’s obviously going on right now. Anyone paying attention should have rushed out to get their AR, or another one, or a .308 semi-auto, or more ammo, back in late summer when the blonde local reporter was shot by a dindu (supposedly) on live TV.

      Now, finally, the prices have inched up a little bit, after Black Friday, Paris, SanBern, Obama’s treasonous acts. Simple supply and demand says prices should have risen by now. I comment all of the big sellers for not gouging, so far. I know a few “budget” options to get a .308 semi-auto with 20-round capacity, based no the G3/HK91/CETME battle rifle (not the best ergos, but proven reliable, and at least you’ll have something with an 18″ barrel that shoots .308 reliably) one of them about $770 and the other as low as $619, two months ago, one month ago, and even 5 days ago. Sure enough the prices have inched up a little since 2 days ago. Century C308 (getting great reviews) is up to about $670 when it could be had for $600 a few months ago.

      I have been monitoring these things, trying to get the cash together to be able to grab one. I am pissed off that I have not been able to buy everything I wanted to grab the last 3 months, because of course I have other financial obligations that must be met in this matrix world that has not gone fully SHTF yet.

  13. Marlo Stanfield | December 7, 2015 at 22:43 |

    | | This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. http://www.avast.com |

    5 judges are Roman Catholic. Clarence Thomas included. They bow to a foreign power. What’s wrong with being a D.C. Catholic? I have been in 8 countries and 15 other states and all of the Catholics say they are Roman. Hmmm?   From: Western Rifle Shooters Association To: marlostanfield53@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 6:23 PM Subject: [New post] War Ratchets Another Click Closer #yiv8080448296 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv8080448296 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv8080448296 a.yiv8080448296primaryactionlink:link, #yiv8080448296 a.yiv8080448296primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv8080448296 a.yiv8080448296primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv8080448296 a.yiv8080448296primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv8080448296 WordPress.com | Concerned American posted: “Supreme decline to hear city-based AW ban.Do you understand yet?” | |

    • Haxo Angmark | December 7, 2015 at 23:26 |

      4 of the 9 are Jews; a 2,200%/population over-representation. And the Vatican Bank is controlled by Rothschild. The only originalist conservative? a Black. Like U

      • ExGeeEye | December 8, 2015 at 00:40 |

        Hmmm
        Kinda outlines the perils of choosing up sides based on genetics.

        • GS | December 8, 2015 at 10:56 |

          Allele mutations in Europeans allow for resistance to HIV infection but higher prevalence of Huntington’s Disease.

          There’s pluses and minuses to anything.

      • Publius 2015 | December 8, 2015 at 14:47 |

        Give Scalia credit. He expressly charged the majority in Obergefel with treason. He came as close as a sitting Justice (trying to avoid assassination; not running an alt-right blog) writing an opinion to be published in the United States Reports can to doing so. He even jabbed at the Jews by noting the “lack of diversity” on the Court. LOL.

  14. kerberos616 | December 7, 2015 at 23:50 |

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

  15. Paul X | December 8, 2015 at 00:49 |

    I have a different take on this. Gun owners have already gotten far more out of the Supremes, with Heller and McDonald, than they had reason to expect. Why? Because the ruling class just naturally hates armed peasants, and for good reason. The Supremes are part of the ruling class. So these latest non-decisions are just going back to the normal situation. We’d be silly to expect more from them. Anyway we don’t care what they say, do we?

    • GS | December 8, 2015 at 11:48 |

      You thought those SCOTUS rulings were for the benefit of those of us in flyover country?

      DC and some other urban centers are going through some re-gentrification. It makes sense for them to help out yuppies who are joining the elite inside the beltway.

      DOJ/ATF recognizes multiple states of legal residence for people who can afford it and won’t touch them when they buy firearms including handguns. Even the 1968 GCA leaves them alone.

      Oh, but all hail George II for giving us our bayonet lugs back!

  16. tfA-t | December 8, 2015 at 11:37 |

    Cops, judges and politicians… need anymore be said?

  17. Alfred E. Neuman | December 8, 2015 at 22:15 |

    Reblogged this on The Lynler Report.