A SAP Synopsis

What-difference-does-it-make-FluShotPrices

From over the transom:

WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE–MAJ ED COET, USA (RET)
[COURTESY: CAPT Les Horn, USN (Ret)]

My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany. In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news.

Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:

1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.

2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.

3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.

4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.

5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.

6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.

7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.

As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.

If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.

If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.

If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government.

If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is ttrue to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.

If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information – period.

ED COET
Major, US Army (Retired)
http://www.bewilderingstories.com/bios/coet_bio.html

P.S. It is my sincere hope that each of you will share this article, to help other Americans understand how grave Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP compromise is. We can’t allow anyone so careless with this level of information to have access to any classified information ever again for as long as she lives. This would surely render her unqualified and unfit to hold any public office let alone POTUS if this allegation proves to be true.

58 responses to “A SAP Synopsis

  1. outlawpatriot

    She will not be indicted. She will be the next President of the United States.

    The system is just that corrupt. 😉

    • At least 4 loyal Democrat women stand between HC and SuperMAX. She’s going to be fine, and likely POTUS after “defeating” Jeb Bush (the only R-candidate who could be supported by and then defeated by the Clinton Machine).

    • The system has been completely infiltrated by people who the HUAC and associated domestic agencies would’ve removed in the past.

      The cover story is the future CUNTUS just had an oops and the IT dept didn’t catch it. Fine, let’s go with that. Should such a person and her appointees be trusted with the nuclear football? Simple logic would say no. They’ve shown themselves to be at the very least retarded fuckups.

      An arrest should’ve happened on live TV during one of the debates. Like Oswald getting shot, this would’ve sent a clear message. That she’s still up there shows something’s still afoot. That in and of itself is also a message.

      Anyone who had a clearance and used a friggin’ Blackberry within the last 10 years knows the cover story has been complete bullshit since day one. The guys who actually operate in electronic communication can’t disclose very much without getting hammered. I would love to pick their brains for an hour. They’ve also been seeing those generals and admirals getting relieved and early retired for the last few years. I imagine they might already be scared shitless about what’s past the horizon.

      The deeper story may involve an unsecured server where noforns had unlimited access to classified information. What if the transfer of information was the intent all along? People assume that the only thing running through this server was her email. Newsflash: servers do more than handle email.

      Is it just a coincidence that another Clintonite had another oops involving the data breache at OPM? Who got that list of names? What are they going to do with it?

      I don’t believe in “coincidences” either.

  2. Reblogged this on The zombie apocalypse survival homestead and commented:
    Oh, the wages of sin!

    A SAP is intel so sensitive that absolutely NO ONE gets to know about it unless they are directly involved.

    Breaking rocks in the hot sun. I’m sure shrillary can get ‘er done. Though I wonder if orange will compliment her complexion.

  3. Per Ed Coet.

    “….to help other Americans understand how grave Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP compromise is.”

    So what ? Hell, Coet doesn’t even have the ‘nads to call the compromise for what it is….he terms it “alleged”. Freakin’ political correctness.

    And Patriots are supposed to get spun up over allegations by some USA retired guy ? Besides, it’s a little late for the retired USA Major to be imploring citizens to give a rat’s ass about fUSA’s security and how Clinton “ALLEGEDLY”compromised the nation.

    Seems to me barry soetoro obama hussein barack or whatever name this scoundrel is known by, compromised the US Constitution along with the American nation, national security and it’s peoples, with his anointment, in violation of the US Constitution, to the presidency. The citizenry, en masse, accepted the ineligible soetoro-obama along with the multitude of treasonous scum he has installed throughout the woodwork of fedgov. Now at this late date we should be concerned with Clinton ? The damage to the economy and the sovereignty of this once, great nation has been done over the last 7+ years.

    Look at the Mexican border. Look at the sanctuary cities. Look at the unending conflict in the Middle East sucking up our blood and treasure for more than 14 years ! AND FOR WHAT ?

    Cry me a river.

  4. Not indicting that whore will be one more nail in the coffin of this once great nation.

  5. Hell, soetoro-obama’s SSN couldn’t pass e-verify….and look where he sits ?

  6. thats all great, but she walks. you live under a rock or something? march madness! aint nobody gots no time fo this! gimme dat shit!

  7. I hate Hillary. I fear her holding offices of power.

    That being said, I cannot endorse the notion of anyone being thrown in prison for life for bits on a computer. It’s a victimless crime, until it ACTUALLY contributes to the ACTUAL death of someone.

    Show me the harm.

    I also stand beside Snowden, though. Which many in the .mil infosec game do not.

    Government has too many secrets. Most likely because they’d be shameful if let to light. If they see light through deliberate actions (Snowden) or incompetence (Hillary) I do not care. Whatever disempowers, deligitimizes and upends any government is A-OK with me.

    • Your bank account and your investments, if any, and those of everyone you love are “just bits in a computer”. How would you like someone manipulating those?

    • You’ve created a paradox here, for if someone dies because of Shitlery’s actions, the fact that the person worked where-ever doing SpecialAccessProgram work would be classified and not to be released under “discovery” in pre-trial. This sets up the condition where if we do not release the program information, she walks because she can’t defend herself. Conversely, allow the defense to explore the SAP program and you’ve just compromised the program AGAIN.

    • This attitude is how by degrees we get where we are.
      Is it the LAW that NO ONE is allowed to do to any classified documents what Hitlery did ?
      If “YES” then jail.
      If “NO” then apologize to Petraeus, Snowden, Pollard.
      The law is supposed to be the law and blind to social status/$$.
      (snicker, snicker. Hitlery will never be indicted. She probably knows where Odama’s dead gay friends are buried. And Reggie’s favorite gay-game w/BHO.)

    • exactly. Mrs Clinton practices a Higher Patriotism. She must and will be (the last) POTUS

    • I don’t know if any SAP was involved, although I suspect it was, but you should remember, KC, four people died while she was SecState, and she was directly involved in blocking any help to them. As for the computer bits, you may want to refresh your memory regarding high crimes and misdemeanors by public officials.

  8. “Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise”

    So.
    Ed Coet would have kept hidden, what Snowden exposed. Just another scumbag traitor keeping secrets from his employers – the taxpayer. Put him on the kill list too.

    • It’s worse than that. SAP means the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing. If the chief executive doesn’t know about everything, then he’s not the chief executive; who is? Maybe no one is, and government is just a big collection of uncoordinated islands of makework, with SAP as window dressing to make it appear like it’s doing an important job. The intelligence community didn’t predict the collapse of the Soviet Union, so why would you trust anything else they say?

    • tfA-t,

      I have never forgotten the video/audio from an American AH-64, that Snowden exposed, shooting up a news cameraman and unarmed Iraqi non-combatant citizens. Shooting them up because the Apache crew BEGGED their controller to go “guns-free”; because the crew claimed they saw weapons on the Iraqis; there were no weapons. The Apache crew lied.

      They get the go ahead to shoot up these Iraqi people, killing and wounding them. One wounded tried to crawl to safety. When a van pulled up to try to rescue the non-combatant, wounded Iraqi, the Apache crew again begged to go “guns-free”. The murdering pigs got their wish…..they shot up the van and killed the innocent, unarmed, wounded, non-combatant Iraqi. They then gleefully laughed about the murders they would never be prosecuted for.

      Is it any wonder why Amerikans are hated the world over ?

      Snowden is a hero in my book. Just the fact that it is the soetoro-obama criminal administration persecuting Snowden is all one needs to know.

      ‘merika

      • Centra Spike

        Dude if you’re going to tell stories at least spend 30 seconds on Google to get your shit straight. Pvt. “Chelsea” Manning was the one that leaked the Apache footage, and a metric shit-ton of other stuff to WikiLeaks.

        Putting out incorrect information makes you look like a fool which in turn allows the outside world to point and say, “Hey! Look at that fool and all his idiot by association friends.” Smooth move ExLax. Stop helping.

  9. Sic ’em!!

  10. She gets through FL, then claims a health problem. Joe rescues. She later dies of a fat embolism caused by a broken toe.

    Do realize that neither the red pill nor the blue pill is at full strength. Sorta like being trapped in a lame cherry state…always.

  11. No need for tha, tfA-t. I hope Major Coet, by his participation in this blog, is coming to realize that he (as all us former sheepdogs) has been duped. Security, like law and order, pertains only to the lawful and orderly. He’s giving us the “school solution” just like he learned and practiced it. Just as the sheepdogs practice it now. The real question is how far can hillary and the rest of the Enemy push this without her own party calling “foul”.

  12. The FBI just executed LeVoy Finnicum, they are supposedly undertaking a round up of 67 American’s who may or may not have information of the BLM’s criminal unconstitutional land confiscation and corruption actions, it also was involved in Ruby Ridge, Waco and the execution of hundreds of Americans, and who really knows what other egregious acts of treason it has also been involved in. And the is documented evidence the Clintons themselves, along with the Clinton State Department is involved in the BLM criminal corruption.

    Now I didn’t just fall off the turnip truck. How in the hell is the FBI, never mind this government, and in particular the insanely politicized and corrupt Attourney’s General Office, going to go after Hillary Clinton for violation of secrecy laws when all parties involved are corrupted?

    I would think if anything, the installation of Hillary is a prime objective. Because if you reason out what these maniacs running thing require more than anything other than more power, is to install Hillary as POTUS. What better way is there to hide the truth than to give your most corrupt actor the absolute means to control the truth as POTUS?

    It is all well and good we as people believe in and hold onto what is right, but those in our government are not those kind. They are dirty to their cores, corrupt, without scruples or moral compass. If they can assassinate a guy like LeVoy Finnicum, and rub our noses in it with a video, then make political prisoners out of 70 plus people because they rightfully stood up for what is legal, legitimate, right and proper, well letting Hillary and her ilk off is simple pie.
    After all, who, who in the entire federal and state governments are going to stop them?

    • SemperFi, 0321

      Goes back to the old story of begging the Gestapo to investigate the SS, and expecting fair results.
      The FBI are controlled by the same people who own HRC, i.e. Kissinger and Co. Did anything happen after Ruby Ridge or Waco? Aside from a few set-up bomb plots, has the FBI ever prosecuted anyone in Fedgov? One constant dog and pony show for the state media.
      And now mass denial settles in……..again.

  13. Hey there RETIRED Dumb Ass….and I quote ” not even the POTUS could get away with something like this with our system of government “” HHaaaaaa Ha HaaAAAAAa aaaaaaa there in lies the problem you statist LIFER shill “THIS SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT ” You choose to live the life for the paycheck and now join the PATRIOT movement and spread the truth ????? there is no system of government , it is called a DICTATORSHIP go back under your rock…………

  14. NotAJAGOfficer

    A completely erroneous statement of law: “If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton…[he] could himself face criminal prosecution … .”

    Keep out of the JAG office, S2 Major. Thanks.

  15. I’d offer that some may want to just take the opportunity to pass along that information to others who may not follow this as closely as the latest red-carpet walk, without the overall arm-waving. The poster is speaking about one thing, from their own (albeit accurate) perspective & experience. If* information related to a SAP was compromised I can virtually guarantee you that someone died. Nation-state adversaries send people up chimneys for that kind of thing.

    * Even in the woods in resistances of long-ago folks got a hearing and some defense before they had to dig their own hole (or not), or perhaps be taken far away & banished with what was on their back.

    • Someone did die. In fact 4 someones. The 4 men who died in Benghazi.

      • Frankly I think that was just balls-out cowardice. I suspect you know I’m talking about sources, but I get what you’re saying & quite agree. Plenty of rope to go around.

        • I get your drift, but its very well possible that classified data relating to Ambassador Steven’s visit to Bengahzi was on that server. It could be even deeper than that. No one has come completely clean about what that CIA annex and Stevens visit were really all about. If that data sat on her bathroom server and it was compromised by Syria or Russia then it very well could have painted that location as a target for attack.
          That incident was probably a wake up call to anyone on a SAP program that involved State, to your point, ANYONE could be subject to compromise because of the potential leak her irresponsibility caused.

          She does not give a shit about anyone below her rise to power however so “what difference does it make”. They are just collateral damage.

  16. Hitlery wins FBI has a we get what ever we want card to play.

  17. Theres that”impeachment”word again.God I am so friggin sick of hearing that BS.ARREST the traitors.DONE.

  18. These remarks are not about the vile and reprehensible Hillary Clinton. They are about the validity of this article. And because this is way too long, I’ll just give a short summary at first and you can skip the rest if you want.

    Executive summary:
    I did a search on the author. I’m not finding enough to satisfy my BS Detector. Much as I would like all this to be real, I must suspend judgement until further verification of the source.

    The details of the search:
    The search using the search terms Ed Coet, and Major Ed Coet, USA (ret), brings up only one bio, and a dozen or so references to this article.

    The biography asserts that he is a retired army officer, a professional educator, and a freelance writer having published poems in a half-dozen anthologies. The bio indicates that he has an “online journal” of his own (Blue Fog Journal), but does not provide a link. An online search discovers it, but it has only two entries from Nov. 2014, and so is not current. A LinkedIn blog of the same name is owned and administered by one Rohitash Chandra, published out of Fiji; any mention of Coet is behind a sign-in firewall; a reference to the Blue Fog Poetry Journal, issue #1 does not list Coet in the lineup of authors. The biography does provides a link to Coet’s “blog”, but it does not go to the “online journal” but to a Dutch blog which is an empty shell by one Arlene Ramirez, of Grey Matter Promotions, Chelsea College of Art and Design, Chelsea, London, UK.
    The anthologies listed all seem legit, with entries from Coet in all of them but one.

    Coet also shows up having self-published a couple books for sale on Amazon, one of poetry and the other a “true-crime” thriller which is unavailable; the Amazon author page is curiously empty of any info on the author.

    Finally, there is one letter to the editor of the Killeen (TX) Daily Herald in 2012 from Coet, listing reasons in favor of gun ownership.

    In other words, his writing career is largely poetry, not intelligence commentary. His bio is a bit misleading. If he does have an intel background, it has heretofore not shown up in his writing.

    Other than that, a search brings up only this article which is linked many times in various online and Facebook venues.

    There is not a lot here to indicate that Coet is much more than an obscure writer. This may, of course, be the proper “grey man” persona for someone who was in army intelligence for a while, rising to the rank of major. There is much here to indicate that Coet is an imaginative writer, and there is a clarity about this writing here that is compelling. Whether he is who he claims to be in this article is hard to dig down to.

    So again, much as I would like all this to be real, I must suspend judgement until further verification of the source.

  19. She will be indicted and tossed in jail for a while.

  20. Obviously Maj Coet does NOT understand just who Obama and Hillary are and the power they hold in the govt and political spheres. She will not be indicted no matter what was on the server. AG Lynch already has orders to not prosecute though she will make up some excuse unrelated to her “discussion” with Obama.

    And now that Justice Anton Scalia has been found dead of “natural causes” on a West TX ranch… expect the Republicans in the Senate to approve another appointment to SCOTUS by Barry Sotero. And the Republicans have already said they will do nothing against Obama!

    I guess I’m gonna need even more ammo.

    /r
    Grey Ghost

  21. The military takes Hillary out. Hillary is a neocon favorite. I see more rifts like that all the time, Hersch’s article last year the latest big one.

    There are still good people in gov, I think, hints here and there. The FBI never said OBL did 9/11, has not listed murders in Sandy Hook’s hoax.

    • thinking freedom,

      “There are still good people in gov….”

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha !

  22. Fayette County, TX

    KC, what makes you so certain that someone has not died because of her crimes? WHO is going to bring it to light?

    The criminal tyrants must all be held accountable for their actions.

  23. yep she deserves & belongs in prison. …bits on a computer…???? upending a ‘govt’ ??? how about upending our country which is supposed to be me and you? rules and laws are just for regular ppl in your mind I’m assuming.
    and snowden lives where? and why? and he was running for what job? sorry, big difference there.

  24. My name is nobody

    This government is so utterly and brazenly corrupt that not a thing will happen to Shillary. The attorney general has and will continue to stonewall and shield her, Barry and his henchmen will back her up and cover for her, and there is not a damn thing that will happen to them. Get this through your heads people, we are screwed. The rule of law has been usurped. You better get yourself ready for it. This country is headed downhill faster than a Dixie Chicks tour bus passing the local VFW hall. Such a shame.

  25. Empress Hillary, The Bushpig, could drive a burning truck full of kittens through a nursery school and nothing would happen. Get used to it .

  26. Reblogged this on westfargomusings and commented:
    I don’t think there’s anything to add to what Maj. Coet (Retired) said here.

  27. Fantastic post. Here’s the rub re: Obama pardoning Hillary.

    “…he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution.”

    And just how would that happen, short of being part of a revolutionary epilogue?

  28. p.s. Most everyone slow off the blocks seems to be working on the bizarre assumption that Hillary and her little crew of elves was able to keep this a perfect secret the entire time it was going on.

    And that makes sense how?

    Considering that you couldn’t take a shit in DC without someone noting the colour and consistency of it, the idea that Obama’s administration had no clue this was going on from the moment it began is utterly laughable.

  29. I would like to share this information however, it contains improper word usage. . The word and “then” is used as opposed to the word, “than”. “Then” is mainly an adverb, often used to situate actions in time whereas “than” is used when comparing things.

    This may not seem to be a big deal but I think it speaks to the veracity of the content. Perhaps the content was dictated rather than typed. I have noticed in dictation these words are often swapped.

    • I prefer to see proper grammar as much as the next but if you’re letting an extremely common error, especially one often seen when folks type or write about a subject with some passion, you’re likely going to miss quite a bit letting that inform your veracity-meter. 🙂

    • Jennifer,

      Your observation is not any different from my observations of the morons who don’t know the difference between “to” and “too” or “your” and “you’re”.
      Products of a government school.

      With the influx of invaders…. Hispanic, Middle Easteners, Asians, etc., you haven’t seen nothing yet !

      • “Loose” v. “lose.” So common as to be ubiquitous.

      • SemperFi, 0321

        As much as I despise grammar nazis, some of the comments (here and other blogs) are so badly written that I haven’t a clue what they’re really trying to say.
        Our language skills on a national level are so low there is no hope of ever attaining how they were 100 years ago, or even 50 when we went to school. I have 2 friends whose wives are school teachers, barely able to teach children the 3 R’s because they themselves are slackers of the worst kind. Parents are complaining of how bad they are in the classroom, the students actually learn from a big online computor screen while the teacher is nothing more than a class monitor. But they want their paycheck a little bigger every year too.
        And all around us, adults speak and write like they’re ghetto monkeys, because they think it’s cool to be PC and mock Hollywood.
        I can’t take much more of this shit from what I assumed were my peers.

  30. The State is everything – nothing exists outside the State. Understand that and you may begin to comprehend how deep (bottomless?) the rabbit hole really is – for all the hand wringing, the hooting/hollering, finger pointing and conjecture the truth (as at least I see it) is everything that has been expressed here (and other sites) is, 1) well within the ‘rabbit hole’ given the State expects some ‘push back’ and 2) everything that has been expressed is monitored with pretty clear tracking to its original source (that would be both you and me).
    As always, while not ever mentioned by our ‘betters’ (you know who they are), follow the money (and if you can not, that is a pretty clear indication that tracks are well hidden). Money drives the system and the system is power – a ‘candidate’ is only the representative of the power source and to that end, if you want to understand the State, you (and I) must understand the source (especially if you want to kill [a harsh word there but I lacked the ability to come up with something better] the power structure).

  31. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on MCS.

  32. gunnyginalaska

    As someone who has played in the SAP world for years, do not forget that there are also SAPs that are so deep in the “black” that the won’t even be acknowledged if details of them are somehow found out. Hillary should be executed for her betrayal of that world as well as exposing “sources and methods.”

  33. “If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her”

    Hope springs eternal in the human breast. However, that’s not the way the world works.

  34. NightWatcher

    The goal is POWER.

    Individuals with power don’t run for public office, they control those in public office. HRC would be the perfect puppet given what the puppeteers know or have possession of. Why would they waste that on a simple indictment?