Bunkerville Redux: BLM’s Momentum And Cleveland


One advantage held by Team Outrage: material outside backing both in dollars and in kind.

Katy, bar the door if they can exploit it in the field.


18 responses to “Bunkerville Redux: BLM’s Momentum And Cleveland

  1. ” . . . . the patriot movement pissed away the momentum and propaganda value of the moment with infighting . . . .”

    COINTELPRO II: Electric Bugaloo ?

  2. Would point out BLM has been givin’ but they haven’t gotten yet.
    Be interesting to see how this shakes out when they start taking casualties.
    I refer to Bracken’s pick up truck riflemen. Tactics. Tactics. Tactics.
    Observe. Orient. Decide. Act.

    • Absolutely. Everything up to this point has been kabuki theater and not a whole lot more. As Mike Tyson used to say, everyone has a plan until you get punched in the face. I maintain that the status quo will remain until a legitimate firefight develops between two of the Balkanizing factions in America… And at that point I think for many people it will remove that final mental barrier of inaction and it will be game on.

      • Bill Harzia

        “…And at that point I think for many people it will remove that final mental barrier of inaction and it will be game on.”


        “It doesn’t matter how skilled a fighter you are if the small voice in the back of your head won’t let you act.” – Selco

        Well, the voice is starting to speak up.

    • Steve Kristmann

      Ah, you mean this essay, Witt?

      Bracken: When The Music Stops – How America’s Cities May Explode In Violence

      Specifically the “the suburban armed vigilante response”

      Yes, that would definitely plant a boot swiftly up blm’s rioting
      “MUY” fat ass! The HMF’sTITTIC would be going apoplectic
      with the crack-addled, moslem collectivist red diaper post pubescent kenyan manchild throwing the mother or all hissyfits like the world has never

      Yours in Liberty – islam must be destroyed!
      NorthGunner III

    • We need a “like” button, Matt….

  3. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on ETC., ETC., & ETC..

  4. outlawpatriot

    Say what you want, NBP is a well regulated militia. Just sayin’. 🙂

  5. thesouthwasrght

    “Freedom or Death” under an image of africa. Am I missing something, are there laws forbidding anyone from packin’ up dey sheet and moving there? So far as I am aware there aren’t.

  6. Screw BLM and screw the “convention”. Complete shite all of it.

    Trust me they are all salivating to see an overreaction by the PO. It won’t end well but we let the commies go to far with this shite. We will now pay the piper for not having hung some commie fuckers from lamposts and i’m not talking about black people.

  7. FrozenPatriot

    So it’s the gestapo against the Free Shit Army? I have a serious problem…I don’t have enough popcorn…

    Between PT, popcorn, and LOLing at the .gov-lovers’ civil war, I’ll be brushing up on the Sniper Ambush section here:

    Got tribe & pickups? …& muffled .300AAC Blackout?

  8. The Patriots had a bad plan in Oregon but nothing is as bad a plan as this race war Obama, Hillary and the BLM are waging on the police. The only thing propping up an out of control big govt is are the POLICE!!!!!! Without the threat of going to jail, who would pay taxes, stop at stop signs or not beat up that jerk neighbor next door. The Ferguson effect, where the cops just sit in their car and allow the ghetto thugs to commit genocide on their own race, has exploded across Amerika. Baltimore and Chicago have exploded with black on black murder since the police there were emasculated. Now, half way thru the long hot violent summer, expect the police in Dallas and Baton Rouge and many other agencies, to just sit in their cars and eat donuts and allow crime to run rampant in our big cities. A hundred extra black kids will die for every cop that gets murdered. And those black kids will not be murdered by the police. Other young black men will be out there committing genocide on their own race, as the cops sit in their cars and watch.
    This is a battle the Patriots have no need to participate in. Let the cops and the black kids kill each other off.

    • colddeadhandsdays

      Hmm…it looks like they will be going after each other business as usual with the added addition of targeting police in targets of opportunity for orchestrated ambushes. It will be shooting cops sitting in the car is eating donuts but after that should each other.

  9. Steve Kristmann

    Hmmmm…should be interesting to watch..the moslem/blm
    alliance won’t be at all happy that Gert Wilders will be there.


    “The invitation was criticized by designated terrorist group CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper, who said, “The Republican Party should not be importing foreign anti-Muslim bigots.” (And NOBODY gives a crap what CAIR thinks)”

    Did you know that the ‘Black Lives Matter’ co-founder is a MUSLIM?

    Black Lives Matter and a History of Islamist Outreach to African Americans

    As Gomer used to say, “Surprise, surprise.”
    Talk about ‘black comedy’..especially since islam has never made
    any mention of hiding it’s hatred of blacks and their usefulness only
    as slaves (‘pedo mo called them ‘raisinheads’).

    Yes..it should be interesting from a entertainment point of view….

    Yours In Liberty w/o effin islam!
    NorthGunner III

  10. The Usual Suspect

    This is a battle the Patriots have no need to participate in. Let the cops and the black kids kill each other off.
    Yeah ! But it won’t work out that way, somewhere, sometime soon, the angry
    low hanging fruit BLM pawns will decide to loot whitey’s enclaves and there
    will be slaughter.
    This is what the chocolate emperor thinks he wants.
    In reality he will have pushed about 80 million go buttons, dumb ass.

  11. http://wearechange.org/executive-order-united-nations-allowed-use-force-us-citizens/

    President Obama has signed an executive order that allows for the US military to use force against American citizens for the first time in history.
    The order was signed on July 1st, 2016 and is titled “Executive Order — United States Policy on Pre- and Post-Strike Measures to Address Civilian Casualties in U.S. Operations Involving the Use of Force“.

    The order appears to have changed the rules of engagement between the military and ordinary U.S. citizens in an end-around the Constitution.

    Whitehouse.gov reports:



    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct as follows:

    Section 1. Purpose. United States policy on civilian casualties resulting from U.S. operations involving the use of force in armed conflict or in the exercise of the Nation’s inherent right of self-defense is based on our national interests, our values, and our legal obligations. As a Nation, we are steadfastly committed to complying with our obligations under the law of armed conflict, including those that address the protection of civilians, such as the fundamental principles of necessity, humanity, distinction, and proportionality.

    The protection of civilians is fundamentally consistent with the effective, efficient, and decisive use of force in pursuit of U.S. national interests. Minimizing civilian casualties can further mission objectives; help maintain the support of partner governments and vulnerable populations, especially in the conduct of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations; and enhance the legitimacy and sustainability of U.S. operations critical to our national security. As a matter of policy, the United States therefore routinely imposes certain heightened policy standards that are more protective than the requirements of the law of armed conflict that relate to the protection of civilians.

    Civilian casualties are a tragic and at times unavoidable consequence of the use of force in situations of armed conflict or in the exercise of a state’s inherent right of self-defense. The U.S. Government shall maintain and promote best practices that reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, take appropriate steps when such casualties occur, and draw lessons from our operations to further enhance the protection of civilians.

    Sec. 2. Policy. In furtherance of U.S. Government efforts to protect civilians in U.S. operations involving the use of force in armed conflict or in the exercise of the Nation’s inherent right of self-defense, and with a view toward enhancing such efforts, relevant departments and agencies (agencies) shall continue to take certain measures in present and future operations.

    (a) In particular, relevant agencies shall, consistent with mission objectives and applicable law, including the law of armed conflict:

    (i) train personnel, commensurate with their responsibilities, on compliance with legal obligations and policy guidance that address the protection of civilians and on implementation of best practices that reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, including through exercises, pre-deployment training, and simulations of complex operational environments that include civilians;

    (ii) develop, acquire, and field intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems that, by enabling more accurate battlespace awareness, contribute to the protection of civilians;

    (iii) develop, acquire, and field weapon systems and other technological capabilities that further enable the discriminate use of force in different operational contexts;

    (iv) take feasible precautions in conducting attacks to reduce the likelihood of civilian casualties, such as providing warnings to the civilian population (unless the circumstances do not permit), adjusting the timing of attacks, taking steps to ensure military objectives and civilians are clearly distinguished, and taking other measures appropriate to the circumstances; and

    (v) conduct assessments that assist in the reduction of civilian casualties by identifying risks to civilians and evaluating efforts to reduce risks to civilians.

    (b) In addition to the responsibilities above, relevant agencies shall also, as appropriate and consistent with mission objectives and applicable law, including the law of armed conflict:

    (i) review or investigate incidents involving civilian casualties, including by considering relevant and credible information from all available sources, such as other agencies, partner governments, and nongovernmental organizations, and take measures to mitigate the likelihood of future incidents of civilian casualties;

    (ii) acknowledge U.S. Government responsibility for civilian casualties and offer condolences, including ex gratia payments, to civilians who are injured or to the families of civilians who are killed;

    (iii) engage with foreign partners to share and learn best practices for reducing the likelihood of and responding to civilian casualties, including through appropriate training and assistance; and

    (iv) maintain channels for engagement with the International Committee of the Red Cross and other nongovernmental organizations that operate in conflict zones and encourage such organizations to assist in efforts to distinguish between military objectives and civilians, including by appropriately marking protected facilities, vehicles, and personnel, and by providing updated information on the locations of such facilities and personnel.

    Sec. 3. Report on Strikes Undertaken by the U.S. Government Against Terrorist Targets Outside Areas of Active Hostilities. (a) The Director of National Intelligence (DNI), or such other official as the President may designate, shall obtain from relevant agencies information about the number of strikes undertaken by the U.S. Government against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, as well as assessments of combatant and non-combatant deaths resulting from those strikes, and publicly release an unclassified summary of such information no later than May 1, 2017. By May 1 of each subsequent year, as consistent with the need to protect sources and methods, the DNI shall publicly release a report with the same information for the preceding calendar year.

    (b) The annual report shall also include information obtained from relevant agencies regarding the general sources of information and methodology used to conduct these assessments and, as feasible and appropriate, shall address the general reasons for discrepancies between post-strike assessments from the U.S. Government and credible reporting from nongovernmental organizations regarding non-combatant deaths resulting from strikes undertaken by the U.S. Government against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.

    (c) In preparing a report under this section, the DNI shall review relevant and credible post-strike all-source reporting, including such information from nongovernmental sources, for the purpose of ensuring that this reporting is available to and considered by relevant agencies in their assessment of deaths.

    (d) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs may, as appropriate, request that the head of any relevant agency conduct additional reviews related to the intelligence assessments of deaths from strikes against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.

    Sec. 4. Periodic Consultation. In furtherance of the policies and practices set forth in this order, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, through the National Security Council staff, will convene agencies with relevant defense, counterterrorism, intelligence, legal, civilian protection, and technology expertise to consult on civilian casualty trends, consider potential improvements to U.S. Government civilian casualty mitigation efforts, and, as appropriate, report to the Deputies and Principals Committees, consistent with Presidential Policy Directive 1 or its successor. Specific incidents will not be considered in this context, and will continue to be examined within relevant chains of command.

    Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) The policies and practices set forth above are not intended to alter, and shall be implemented consistent with, the authority and responsibility of commanders and other U.S. personnel to execute their mission as directed by the President or other appropriate authorities, which necessarily includes the inherent right of self-defense and the maintenance of good order and discipline among U.S. personnel. No part of this order modifies the chain of command of the U.S. Armed Forces or the authority of U.S. commanders.

    (b) No part of this order modifies priorities in the collection of intelligence or the development, acquisition, or fielding of weapon systems and other technological capabilities.

    (c) No part of this order shall prejudice or supplant established procedures pertaining to administrative or criminal investigative or judicial processes in the context of the military justice system or other applicable law and regulation.

    (d) The policies set forth in this order are consistent with existing U.S. obligations under international law and are not intended to create new international legal obligations; nor shall anything in this order be construed to derogate from obligations under applicable law, including the law of armed conflict.

    (e) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


    July 1, 2016.

    Sources: http://americanintelligencereport.com/u-s-approves-united-nations-use-of-military-force-on-american-soil


  12. Grenadier1

    We are Battle tracking the RNC over at Forward Observer
    check here for updated info