Why Our Problems Are Insoluble


David Warren on the Divine, the secular, and those who walk that line.

Man, having faith only in himself, has condemned himself and his fellows to destruction.

And the party is just getting started.

Get right with God as you understand him.

7 responses to “Why Our Problems Are Insoluble

  1. We must help each other. Nobody else will.

    Bad news: 98% of white men remain clueless. I’ve been telling white men in meatspace these exact words for a year, trying to recruit a group and help men understand it is okay to love our own people. 100% strikeout rate. Have not found one non-clueless white men yet.


      Publius: It’s not time yet. They still have their illusions of bread and circuses. They are still squandering their money on skull-and-crossbones-type tattoos, growing “manly” beards, and posing with edged weapons and firearms they do not know how to use. I see it all the time here in Rawles Land. And, over in Spokane Valley it is even more pathetic: Man Buns, beards, lumberjack clothes, skinny jeans,and mincing walks.
      I do not know when the festivities will start. I hope it will be soon enough that I won’t be so decrepit as to be useless. Keep prepping and training. The folks who are eschewing your counsel will eventually be beating a path to your door and begging for your help.

  2. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on ETC., ETC., & ETC..

  3. Obtaining a solution to the root of the problem, the cultural marxists, is going to take a lot of dirt people guts and virtue, and cultural marxist blood.
    Yet honorably it is our selves and our community solidarity, a little at a time, part by parcel, that are the seeds of the destruction of the cultural marxists.

    Cultural marxists can not withstand individualism, nor people in solidarity against them and their system of destruction of western civilization, they only succeed when they can turn people against each other. As their motto describes, “Order out of chaos”.

    The unique grace dirt people possess, is it only requires a tiny minority to destroy cultural marxists and their system of human extinction. This is why cultural marxist expend such inordinate energy, resources, and squander vast riches backing and funding efforts to persecute Cake Bakers and execute Ranchers. These are individualists, people who self determine who they themselves are and how they choose to act. They are dirt people who regardless, in spite of, politics and cultural marxism, choose to be true to themselves and their system of traditions, faith, and beliefs. This is the crux of culture, it is upstream, and therefore as people, they are upstream of politics. It is the most powerful thing in the sphere of human activity. And if the cultural marxists are to realize the rotten fruits of their long march, this individualism and self determination must be crushed at every instance it raises it’s banner of legitimacy.

    Cultural marxists reveal their existential vulnerability through their actions. They call themselves cultural marxism because they are so very vulnerable to natural dirt people culture, as dirt people culture consists of a myriad of primal legitimacy’s, we call liberty, it is the grass roots of grass roots. The root of all legitimacy, where legitimacy begins, with self. Nothing is of a higher order or a more humble source. It is impossible to delegitimize something that is the natural acme of legitimacy, because quite simply there is nothing to be found or lacking in such primal order of sovereignty, it just is as the dirt people just are.
    So the question of perspective begs how can dirt people be illegitimate in their culture and traditions? It can not.
    What the cultural marxist strive to accomplish is to make the individual dirt person illegitimate.
    See what they do?
    You can’t make such graceful and virtuous culture bad, so you make people of that culture bad.
    It is like our guns. It is impossible to outlaw the primal right of natural defense, and offense, how can you, it is something dirt people are born with, so cultural marxists outlaw the dirt people with guns.
    See what they do?
    It is pretty cunning really.
    Yet it does not mitigate the cultural marxist soft underbelly. They only have one leg to balance on, and that leg is the perception they are legitimate in their actions of destroying what is legitimate, so there is no contradictory legitimacy to expose them for the true evil beings they are.

    It is a balancing act. It is a precarious position which requires a constant stream of false narrative, outright lies and fabrications, non stop 24/7 memes and media driven agitprop, and seriously useful dupes to commit acts that unbalance the dirt peoples perception of the truth, to keep dirt people off balance, overwhelm them, and leave them vulnerable by distraction from the inherent truth of themselves, thereby obscuration of natural culture and the truth of faith, traditions and virtue of the dirt people.
    At least that is the operational intent of cultural marxist means to their ends.
    We only have to look towards the very president himself to witness the truth of cultural marxists. He himself acts consistently in a figure head manner to sow through abuse of, and abusive leadership, turmoil and chaos. In every respect he is the perfect cultural marxist.

    Rejection of the narrative, the meme, the lies, the false flags, is key, it is also easily accomplished, if one chooses to do so, and therein lies the source of application of the power of ones consent, and withdrawal of consent.
    That is not to say ignore what is being done to us dirt people, but to refuse to consent to the influences, refuse to be manipulated and coerced by it’s intended effects, and thusly as an individual, as a collection of individuals, the cultural marxists loose the only power they have over us.
    Of course, cultural marxists are so utterly bereft of any legitimacy they require our entire system of government to impose their diktat and rule over souls. That is only possible through threat of force and application of violence. this is where cultural marxist blood comes into the picture.
    Our consent is one weapon of liberty, the other is the liberty of our weapons and the freedom they afford us. It is a cultural nut the cultural marxists can not crack.
    Because Fuck You That’s Why.

  4. “Man, having faith only in himself, has condemned himself and his fellows to destruction. And the party is just getting started.”

    Absolute truth.

    From the article… “We cannot imagine a society — whether Christian or of some other religion — governed ultimately by faith, or genuine belief in a cosmic order, which the ruler himself must serve, and to which he must appeal for his own brief authority.”

    This is because we lost faith and belief in a book which is meant to be the worlds final authority. Shifting gears before returning home…

    CA writes… “Get right with God as you understand him.”

    I’m hoping this does not come across as cocky, as I appreciate greatly that my posts here are allowed to stand. In many places they are quickly removed, I believe, for being too “absolute”.

    Does not this above statement demonstrate a specific aspect of “man having faith in himself (in his own understanding)”? If I get right with God as “I” understand him, am I not placing the descriptive attributes of God under my own flawed experiential and emotionally based sense of understanding? Am I not therefore creating, in essence, the god of my imagination by getting right with him as “I” understand him? I submit that inserting the “I” into the equation is why “churchianity” is as fubar’d as it is. Everyone seems to understand Him differently. I further submit that this is intentional. God can be understood.

    I don’t understand how God created everything. I believe He did.

    I don’t understand how Jesus walked on water and caused a raging storm to be still. I believe He did.

    I don’t understand how Peter raised the dead. I believe he did.

    I don’t understand how God could save a wretch like me. I believe He did BECAUSE HE, IN HIS BOOK, SAYS HE DID.

    Is it not better to allow God to explain Himself to us, as He wants to be understood? He wrote a book for just that purpose.

    To understand God is to understand and believe the book He wrote, as that book is the sole location on earth where He explains Himself to us. To understand the book is to understand which parts are written “for” our learning (OT, 4 earthly accounts of Christs ministry to Israel (as King in Matthew, Servant in Mark, Man in Luke and God in John), Acts 1-8 and Hebrew epistles) and which parts are written “directly to” and are “doctrine for” believers today (Paul’s epistles – Romans through Philemon). In Acts 9-28 Paul goes to the Jew first but also to the Gentile. Acts 28:28 the Jews are cast aside for the third time. All men are now equally sinful in Gods sight. And the book of Romans begins… for all have sinned and come short of the glory of God (3:23).

    Example: John claims in…

    1 John 3:9 (that)… “Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.”

    Can any man lay honest claim to such in this present evil world? (He who does just sinned.) Can that verse therefore be written directly to us, for our participation? Not at all. In the past (early Acts) and in the future (Heb – Rev) this verse was and will be true for some, but it is not today.

    Is James writing to believers today when he addresses his epistle to the twelve tribes scattered abroad (James 1:1)? If somehow a believer makes himself “spiritual Israel” a “grafted in branch” or “Israel 2.0” than I guess he is… (many mistakenly do). I left a church that did to begin one that did not.

    A man today gets right with God by reading and believing Paul’s epistles; by trusting in the gospel message of grace given to Paul (1 Cor 15:1-4); inspired by the risen and glorified Lord Jesus Christ. We today are ALL sinners in need of a Savior to pay for that sin condition as we cannot pay for it ourselves. All the good works in the world cannot alter your image in Adam (Gen 5:3) to an image in Christ (2 Cor 3:18). Only God can do that.

    Gal 1:11-12… “But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.”

    God has revealed fully what He wants us to know.

    Lazy Christians claim this verse…

    1 Cor 2:9… “But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.”

    And yet ignore the next…

    1 Cor 2:10… “But God hath REVEALED them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.”

    …because STUDY (2 Tim 2:15) takes work. (NIV replaces the word “study” with “do your best”… how utterly lame and weak.)

    That revelation is the completed Word of God; every word inspired by the Holy Spirit; the King James Bible for English speaking people.

    A more clear admonition would therefore be… Get right with God as God would have you understand Him, not as you understand Him to “possibly” be. Where you spend eternity is at stake. No small thing, that.

    Does this make logical sense to some?

    I was remiss in not recommending highly, in a recent post, the book “Start Rightly Dividing” by Justin Johnson (www.graceambassadors.com). It explains “how” to read the Bible rightly divided. It does not tell you what the Bible means because the Bible (God) says what He means and means what He says. (Email GraceCountryBibleChurch at yahoo dot com and I’ll send you a copy free of charge.) The problem with churchianity is NOT that believers are stupid, it is, for lack of proper instruction, that they don’t know how to read their Bible (what scripture is “for” versus “to” them) and therefore can not identify that which is scripture at all (KJB) from that which is counterfeit. Right division has been intentionally erased from modern translations in order to cause the confusion in the church it has. Divide and conquer. Examine…

    Gal 2:7 (KJB)… “But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;”

    Here we have two distinct gospel messages to two different groups.

    Gal 2:7 (NIV)… “On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised”

    Here we have one gospel message to two different groups.

    This is a huge problem as the messages could not be more different. A Christian either has a final authority (Gods book – KJB), or he himself becomes the authority, creating for himself the god of his own understanding; or he allows others to wield blind “divine” authority over him.

    God would not have written a clear book if He did not want you to clearly understand Him. People used to know how to read it but today it has been replaced.

    • “God as you understand him” is AA code for “the primary purpose of this organization is not served by instigating sectarian squabbles”. I used it only in that sense.

      Everyone finds their way to heaven or hell on their own.

      Or so I believe.


  5. I think that one guy has a blog with the masthead, “This ain’t hell, but you can see it from here”, or some such.