Understanding Red Rhetoric Re Trump (Or Any Other Non-Red)


Games Bolshies play.

And how to beat them.


10 responses to “Understanding Red Rhetoric Re Trump (Or Any Other Non-Red)

  1. Note of inquiry; Sir, people are asking about you on Gab. We would love to see you there. Are you leaving twatter or waiting ’til you get purged?

    #2A #PoliceState #4GW

  2. Good article, well researched. Reasonable. It won’t go viral. 🙂

  3. Pepe Rules!

    Proof The FUSA is dead. Couldn’t happen in a better way:

    Proof of the pathetic relevancy:

    Is there any question the Great Fuck You is upstream of all politics?
    Any question of it’s power?
    Even saved on ammo in round 1.

  4. interesting site, that. And a near-perfect definition of what Trump really is: a fake-populist vomited up by the ZOG to trick the flyover country Whites into participating in the System while the System continues to destroy them. To say that Trump is the best political Performance Artist of all time would be an understatement. It’ll be interesting to see how much longer he can continue to fool the NASCAR’s.

  5. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on ETC., ETC., & ETC..

  6. Watching the MSM its pretty obvious the new MO is going to be bogus racist incidents with a tie in to the alt right and then the alt right equals trump and his supporters. They must be worried its all hands on deck to silence the alternate media.

  7. Interesting…very interesting…
    -Sgt Shultz

    Not at all surprised that the collectivists are choosing to align
    with other ‘fellow travellers’ (even though those travellers will not
    hesitate to lop their heads off while screaming ‘Alla Snackbar!!”
    once those ‘useful idiots’ are no longer “useful”).

    New York Times’ Nicholas Kristof: Respond to Trump by joining Hamas-linked CAIR

    Mat Bracken detailed this here btw;
    Tet, Take Two: Islam’s 2016 European Offensive

    Yours in Liberty! Furthermore islam and it’s enablers MUST be destroyed!!
    NorthGunner III

  8. Tuco Ramirez

    Ugh. Piece needs an abstract and/or an executive summary.

  9. Why wasn’t this one reblogged on ETC?