Days Of Rage

days_of_rage

A look back at the Seventies.

And a look ahead?

14 responses to “Days Of Rage

  1. “A reminder: during this period Weatherman is being hunted by the FBI. So how are they staying fed, sheltered, alive? Part of it is fake I.D.s. The other part of Weatherman staying alive and free is: they are being funded and supported by the National Lawyers’ Guild.”

    It needs repeating, since they’ve never gone away:

    “A reminder: during this period Weatherman is being hunted by the FBI. So how are they staying fed, sheltered, alive? Part of it is fake I.D.s. The other part of Weatherman staying alive and free is: they are being funded and supported by the National Lawyers’ Guild.

    • Jimmy the Saint

      NLG is an uber-Lefty group, even Zombie Pol Pot thinks they could moderate their beliefs a bit.

  2. This review is amazing. It’s long, but well worth the time to read. And think about.

  3. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.

  4. There should be 100 comments discussing this essay.

    • “Leadership is disproportionately well-off Jewish kids at elite universities.”

      Let’s discuss.

    • 1000 would be better. Most people today don’t even know this shit happened and worst, the media promoted the lefty turds as heroes i.e. JFKerry and Obamas mentor Ayers who is still in the street raising hell, guilty as hell, free as a bird.

  5. It would seem that the linchpin in all of this is the lawyers.. the unprotected, unaware, seemingly uninterested of their surroundings, lawyers. target these lawyers and their protection is gone, they are just another group of malcontents sitting in county waiting for their court date.

  6. I lived through that shit time while working and going to school. Not fun. Today I’d just shoot those motherfuckers like the mad dogs they are. No more fuckin lefty bullshit games.

  7. Creating the White Tribe.

    Pull quote:

    “It baffles me that more people on the left can’t understand this, can’t see how they’re just feeding, feeding, feeding the growth of this stuff. They have no problem understanding, and even making excuses for, say, the seductive pull of angry black radicalism for disaffected black men. They’re totally cool with straightforwardly racist stuff like La Raza. Why are they unable to put themselves into the shoes of disaffected white guys and see how something similar might appeal to them? Or if they can make this mental leap, why are they so caustically dismissive of it — an attitude they’d never do with, say, a black kid who has joined the Nation of Islam?

    I’m sorry, but there are two alternatives here. You can push for some kind of universalist vision bringing everybody together, or you can have tribes. There’s not a third option. If you don’t want universalism, then you just have to accept that various forms of open white nationalism are eventually going to become a permanent feature of politics. You don’t have to LIKE it. But you have to accept it and learn to live with it — including the inevitable violence and strife that will flow from it.

    If the Left can’t let go of identity politics, then let me be clear: What comes next is on THEM. A lot of us don’t want to live in a world of tribes, and we never asked for it. But people will like those young dudes attracted to white nationalism are going to play the game according to the rules as they find them, and they will play to win. Don’t say you weren’t warned.”

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/creating-the-white-tribe/

  8. From the article:

    “Sustained political violence is dependent on the willing cooperation of admirers and accomplices. The Left has these. The Right does not.”

    The first sentence is true enough.

    The left is losing these, and the right is gaining ground.

  9. I wonder to what extent Trump will negate the Institutional advantages the Left has, and to what extent the Right will acquire Institutional support. Saw a video the other day of a regular guy getting pissed at an Antifa roadblock, smacked a bunch of people, including a woman right in the mouth. Cops were there, watching, let the guy go to work and instead arrested 1 of the Antifa.
    In PORTLAND no less.
    (takes place at very beginning)

    Great post, very informative. But I think the author greatly over-estimates Leftist capacity for violence. The Left of today is not the Left of yesteryear.

    One great example of this is the fact that Leftist violence is virtually always targeted against Leftists. For example, they burn down their own ghettos, they trashed Starbucks and a bank at the DC riots, both of which donated heavily to HRC’s campaign. Contrast that to the rioters at Ferguson bypassing places that had even a handful of men with rifles out front. Also, virtually all of their “protests” are in Lefty controlled cities, their home territory.

    The few times they attack Rightists, its either from ambush (Richard Spencer) or they get their ass handed to them even with huge odds in their favor (video above. Traditionalist Worker’s Party 1st Amendment rally in Sacramento, etc.)

    When the Left has a violent protest in a red county and gives a good accounting of itself, I’ll start to worry.

  10. COINTELPRO – GLADIO – 5th Column – Machiavellian Warfare 4GW / 5GW – Unrestricted Warfare – Identify / Target / Infiltrate / Exploit repeat as necessary.
    Plug – N – Play