Fight For The Patriarchy

Heresy in spades to the modern world.

How’s that ‘modern world’ thing going?

30 responses to “Fight For The Patriarchy

  1. DWEEZIL THE WEASEL

    The battle for the destruction of western culture and values has had a very valuable ally. It is Hollywood and the entertainment industry. Going as far back as the 1930’s, the sheeple were given small doses in films which portrayed fathers and husbands as bumbling, clueless oafs.
    Fast forward to the 1950’s and on to present day. “Fathers” are Archie Bunker and Al Bundy. Male hero figures are Walter White, the meth cooker. And look at the result this has had on our society. We have legions of screaming harpies out there and the family courts routinely crucify fathers over alimony and child custody matters. We have a completely gelded, politically correct military and a syphilitic public education system has totally corrupted and misled generations of Amerikan youths.
    The only way I see this battle being fought by our side is through home and private schooling. Raising upright, moral, intelligent children is an excellent way to combat this. Sadly, the FSA and the Godless, secular, deviant society in general has us outnumbered. Time will tell. Bleib ubrig.

    • Red Star Over Hollywood: The Film Colony’s Long Romance with the Left

      by Ronald Radosh
      Until now, Hollywood’s political history has been dominated by a steady stream of films and memoirs decrying the nightmare of the Red Scare. But Ronald and Allis Radosh show that the real drama of that era lay in the story of the movie stars, directors and especially screenwriters who joined the Communist Party or traveled in its orbit, and made the Party the focus of their political and social lives. The authors’ most controversial discovery is that during the investigations of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, the Hollywood Reds themselves were beset by doubts and disagreements about their disloyalty to America, and their own treatment by the Communist Party. Abandoned by their old CP allies, they faced the Blacklist alone. (less)

      • (((Ronald Radosh))). Ex-Trotskyite communist Jew turned neo-con. Yeah, I guess he does know a lot about this stuff. From the inside.

        “(((they))) faced the Blacklist alone”. Yes, it was tough skipping off to Paris for a couple years, and writing their subversive movie scripts under a pen name. See also: (((Neil Gabler))), AN EMPIRE OF THEIR OWN

      • Jimmy the Saint

        Can’t remember which actress it was, but one of them ran onto a movie set on June 22, 1941 screaming “We’ve been attacked!”

        • at which point she and her fellow citizens should have been flown to Moscow.

    • You’re absolutely correct regarding the family courts…

      My divorce was an ugly one and my ex did everything she could to keep my kids from spending time with me despite specific joint custody agreements. I paid both temporary alimony and full child support for 2 and had to fight to see them on my allotted time, to no success, despite my perfect record of payments. My attorney whom I paid good money for advised me we could fight it at my expense but no promises could be made regarding cooperation since she used the excuse that it was the kids that didn’t want to be with me, not her. We made a couple attempts via the court and in the end, he was correct in his pre-assessment.

      Yes, the family court systems are anti-male to the core and hasn’t changed in the last 20 years whatsoever.

      • Anonymous

        The males being frivorced yet obeying the family court systems are anti-male to the core. These men far outnumber the courts and enforcers, yet meekly submit to the most devastating punishments. Darwin is judging them lacking, it’s good they aren’t reproducing any more.

        The menofthewest author is pushing yet another political hierarchy of subjugation, which, surprise surprise, the author is at the top of.

    • Dienekes

      Agree. To the extent that anyone takes Judeo-Christian (or ANY remotely civilized values!) seriously, I don’t know how you reconcile those with public schooling. The truth is that they’re incompatible at every level!

      Talk about doublethink on steroids.

  2. Angry feminist are dangerous. The Obama admin taught them well. By changing the definition, you drive the narrative.

    UNLESS, one understands their roll, their contribution to the family unit. Like I tell my wife weekly.

    ” Honey, it’s not my fault God put me in charge of this family”, I have my bible flagged on gods words, in case she needs a quick re review.

    Dirk
    .

    • Actually, while there are angry feminists out there, there are also many godly women who fear jumping off the cliff into a traditional marriage (stay home, raise kids, home school them, etc.) because her husband can just dump her for another younger one after a decade or two in a no fault divorce. The only solution is a man and a woman uniting under one banner, which is Jesus.

      • Jimmy the Saint

        “The only solution is a man and a woman uniting under one banner, which is Jesus.”

        What does their landscaper have to do with anything?

        • “GEE-zus,” not “Hay-ZOOS.” Come on, man! LOL

          (Speaking of which, I screwed my landscaper out of $700 today by doing the work myself. On Cinco de Mayo. ‘Murrica!)

        • Daniel K Day

          I laughed. Does that make me a bad person?

      • Randall Flagg

        Agreed.

        “And I say to you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and he that shall marry her that is put away, committeth adultery.” (Matt. 19:9)

        Nonetheless, those who subscribe to sola scriptura, especially Protestants, conveniently overlook this rather straight-forward passage.

        • So what about the part that there is only ONE unforgivable sin? Serious question.

          • Randall Flagg

            Presumably you’re referring to..

            “And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but to him that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven.” (Luke 12:10)

            Again, rather straight-forward.

      • safespaceplaypen

        This is significantly less likely to happen then the opposite – that is, a man getting married to a stay at home wife / career woman then getting taken to the cleaners in the divorce courts (given that 80% of divorces are caused by women). The consequences of marriage are a lot higher to a man than to a woman. Men are more psychologically negatively affected by divorce than women and are more likely to kill themselves and live in a sea of depression afterwards and are more likely to lose their assets and their children.

        No fault divorce was actually DESIGNED so that stay at home wives would have an advantage in the divorce courts, but lo and behold, it actually insentivised all women to dump their marriages.

        While Jesus is a good solution, faith and love isn’t enough. To curb poor behavior good policies need to be implemented. The solution involves both Jesus and a Fault-based patriarchal divorce system, similar to how things were from 0AD to the 1700s.

      • Woman in fear? Do your due diligence,grab your balls and take the leap.There are no guarantees in this crap shoot. The only sure thing is marry a stripper and your life will be similar to riding a runaway roller coaster.

      • Doc Sar, like I said somewhere else, I’m a flawed man. My girl, my wife, is my life mate. If we falter, she deserves her share plus. I will willingly give her what’s due.

        Perhaps I’m viewing life wrong, but we together intentionally have children, who now have children. My wife, My kids, my grandchildren ARE my blessing from above.

        I try hard to be a good man, a decent man, a fair man, a loving man for my family. Odd how it gets easier as I age.

        I’ve spent my entire life trying to be a moral, and ethical man. I’ve had my fair share of failures. I’m still working on both daily.

        Dirk

    • Randolph 'hoping these bitches get disappeared-itis' Scott

      “Angry feminist are dangerous.” These bitches are susceptible to .308 pills.4
      ▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一

      • Jimmy the Saint

        “Can’t live with ’em; can’t chop ’em up into little pieces, bury them in the basement, and tell the neighbors that they went to live with relatives in Phoenix.”
        – Tales From The Crypt

  3. The Communist Roots of No-Fault Divorce
    “In the last few months of 1917, leftist revolutionaries led by Bolshevik Party leader Vladimir Lenin launched a coup d’état against the provisional government. As History.com notes, Lenin became the dictator of first Marxist state in the world and “set in motion political and social changes that would lead to the formation of the Soviet Union.” One of the most profound changes was an attempt to abolish marriage using divorce as the hammer and sickle that would destroy and sweep away the institution.
    No-fault divorce is the term for the dissolution of a marriage on a finding that the relationship is no longer viable, without any need to show “fault” or marital misconduct. Because no-fault divorce was birthed in the USSR, it is worth examining how and why it was instituted in that country and comparing how it mirrors the outcomes in the U.S.”
    In its entirety here:
    https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-communist-roots-of-no-fault-divorce

    This was one of the many posters the communists used to
    promote their crap:

  4. ‘…almost like God created them for that’. {Women nurturing children}

    Ever read the Bible? Never mind, I already know the answer to that.

    LIKEWISE…God created men with a warriors heart. Every single one of us. If that bugs you, good!

  5. Much like the saying, “all politics is local”, so says the same for the Patriarchy, IMHO…

    However, the 1st commenter, (on the site), pretty much says it all when one realizes that it will likely have to fall first before it can be rebuilt. Way too much influence coming from feminists, media’s, hollyweird, federal gubmint, etc…and yes, that DOES include the church’s guilt in allowing itself to be held to political correctness by these same influences.

    Facts don’t lie…as evidenced in what the sanctity of marriage has become today. One may feel their own personal marriage holds such sanctity, to which I congratulate wholeheartedly…but I also know, these surrounding influences can add unnecessary burdens. It isn’t easy being a complete family, nor is it easy being said family’s patriarch.

    But if you are, you have my deepest respect.

  6. Blackdog

    At the point when the man’s income wasn’t sufficient to provide for the family and he needed a 2nd income (the wife) to make ends meet, it was as if he took a 50 percent cut in pay.
    It now took twice the labor to accomplish the same.
    There’s more than one way to screw a cat.

  7. “Enter feminism…” OK:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists/

    Islam, OTOH, is a Patriarchy.

  8. When dumb bitches will not listen, leave them to their fate.

    My God I am finished putting up with stupidity.

  9. The War Against Marriage | Stephen Baskerville and Stefan Molyneux