Check Your Assumptions

Via comments at this post.

10 responses to “Check Your Assumptions

  1. U-dope-pia of the de-ranged?
    If only dope n change would have worked. Nope, it didn’t. If we could only have a conversation about that, everything would be alright. What the hell are you talking about, everything? Nope, and nothing at all because I would like to point out that everything is not alright after 104 years of talking about it, it being everything that is talked about Progressively need I say Damn communists . Obviously, everything is not alright. Let US pick an example or two, perhaps three, such as entitlement, the invasion army of migrants and of course drugs, all of which, if we could only have a conversation about, everything would be alright, right? The short answer is NOPE!
    The conversation is about dopes, so everything will be alright when the talking stops about dope (people on drugs) the entitled, and the invasion, all the rest are nothing more than distraction away from a failed political system, which is not just about Repub LIE crats and Dummy Crats, it’s about the damn Communists. But of course you can vote on that and then everything will be alright too, will it not? Again, NOPE! Not until we have a very serious conversation about who is funding all the nonsense and what is the real end game of the entitled, the invasion and PIG Pharma. NOTE: entitled are not the poor and less fortunate, the entitled are those that presume they are entitled to rule, need I say Govern? The real question is who governs the Government? Consent, I suspect not of the governed.
    Here is the dope. Not that it has more to do with aliens in general and communist in particular in that the deported are not entitled to any benefit from confiscated funds withheld for (FICA) Social Insurance, known to most as Social Security, which it is not. The issue seems to be why should Social Security be paid to the deported for being a communist and support the economy of a communist country? A good question and thoughtfully thought out by of course the Supremes of the day, them in 1960. Still today the same could be said of the so called Dreamers / Aliens in general and communist in particular and of course them should be deported, just my opinion. But even more so, it was decided by the Supremes that just because you paid in don’t mean them have to give it to you, which them do. In other words, you are not entitled! I call that taxation without representation, need I say confiscation! WE don’t owe them a living!
    In part from SS.gov, FLEMMING V. NESTOR 363 U.S. 603
    In this 1960 Supreme Court decision Nestor’s denial of benefits was upheld even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits. Under a 1954 law, Social Security benefits were denied to persons deported for, among other things, having been a member of the Communist party. Accordingly, Mr. Nestor’s benefits were terminated. He appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling, the Court rejected this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right. SS.gov
    Social Security benefits is not contractual right. Did you get that? That also means, they can give the money you may have paid in to those that did not. I suppose that also means any and all of the entitled are not entitled. Think about that for a moment, an hour, a day, or from here to eternity. The only conclusion is, there are no entitlement, period! And this stinks of communist redistribution, which it is. I think the Supremes just made a case for confiscation of asset and deportation of communist, just my opinion, need I say Aliens not documented. Even more on that, those that decided case law, made law and ADMINISTRATED said law are redistributionists and therefore are communist and should be deported as well assets confiscated and obviously no SS for you!
    Interestingly, see Wong Wing V. US, 163 US 228 (1896)
    Page 163 U. S. 229
    On July 15, 1892, Wong Wing, Lee Poy, Lee You Tong, and Chan Wah Dong were brought before John Graves, a commissioner of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan by virtue of a warrant issued upon the complaint of T. E. McDonough, deputy collector of customs, upon a charge of being Chinese persons unlawfully within the United States, and not entitled to remain within the same. The commissioner found that said persons were unlawfully within the United States, and not entitled to remain within the same, and he adjudged that they be imprisoned at hard labor at and in the Detroit House of Correction for a period of sixty days from and including the day of commitment, and that at the expiration of said time, they be removed from the United States to China. Justia US Supreme Court jesters!
    I think it is safe to say, The Court wisdom on Cunstitutionality of said laws, before mentioned there is a lot left unsaid of unintended consequences which are everything after the first ten of the Amendments and consequently require constant clarification pretty much started in the Great Mistake of the not then state Minn e soda, Dread Scott!
    What is clear is the ability of congress and courts to change the rules of the game as we play the game of flexibility. Such is the case of the 14 “A”, such is the UN equal protection under said law (read here in after all above the law) all the way to the validity of public debt. Somewhat well intended however ridiculous the unintended consequences are now! Now we should have them define what a racist is, I suppose. Have at it Supremes! Soon to be defined as equality of income, I suppose, color has nothing to do with it, however it is what them do with it, which does little more than increase public debt.
    Speaking of public debt, more on than you know. I suppose you don’t want to know because the Federal Reserve and said Treasury (the only thing mentioned in said Constitution) too the IRS ( no direst tax, withheld) are said to be Constitutional because of said amendments ratified by said states by said representatives of said states, yet said people of those said state said nothing. Still we debate who can bake a cake for whom, how silly.
    14 “A” consequential damages to Communist China Citizen, as was not then follows as follows:
    It is indeed obvious from some expressions used by the Court in a previous opinion under the exclusion acts that it was perceived that the question now presented might arise; but care was taken to reserve any expression of opinion upon it. Thus, in the case of Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 730, MR. JUSTICE GRAY used the following significant language:
    “The proceeding before a United States judge, as provided for in section 6 of the act of 1892, is in no proper sense a trial and sentence for a crime or offense. It is simply the ascertainment, by appropriate and lawful means, of the fact whether the conditions exist upon which Congress has enacted that an alien of this class may remain within the country. The order of deportation is not a punishment for crime. It is not a ‘banishment,’ in the sense in which that word is often applied to the expulsion of a citizen from his country by way of punishment. It is but a method of enforcing the return to his own country of an alien who has not complied with the conditions upon the performance of which the government of the nation, acting within its constitutional authority and through the proper departments, has determined that his continuing to reside here shall depend. He has not, therefore, been deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process or law, and the provisions of the Constitution securing the right of trial by jury and prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures and cruel and unusual punishments have no application.”
    Why you may ask, Prey tell? Because them are predators, that’s why! They have no legal status. Just because they are here does not mean they belong here and particularly when they come here to leach off the good nature of the oblivious indigenes (no reference to Indians here):- We could argue about who was here first, ya know? But that really makes no difference here today. As stated in 14 “A” no reparations even if that was decidedly concerning the loss of slaves, and slave trade of certain African countries, not to mention Middle Eastern countries, Asian Countries, European Countries and cannibal of the Pacific relations, even American Indians, nope none of them ever knew anything about slavery.
    Please note that 14 “A” was enacted well before this decision of 1896, ah?
    Page 163 U. S. 229
    On July 15, 1892, Wong Wing, Lee Poy, Lee You Tong, and Chan Wah Dong were brought before John Graves, a commissioner of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan by virtue of a warrant issued upon the complaint of T. E. McDonough, deputy collector of customs, upon a charge of being Chinese persons unlawfully within the United States, and not entitled to remain within the same. The commissioner found that said persons were unlawfully within the United States, and not entitled to remain within the same, and he adjudged that they be imprisoned at hard labor at and in the Detroit House of Correction for a period of sixty days from and including the day of commitment, and that at the expiration of said time, they be removed from the United States to China.
    Dream on dreamers! Don’t make no difference where you came from, or how you got here, you ain’t from here and that is the point and I might add more than likely have already benefits, now pay it back! Now you may ask what does all of this have to do with social security and the public debt, I mean other then the SS? The short answer is, we have laws, you know. Probably not, but anyways and means of mass illegal migration for the purpose of augmenting political voting districts, need I say funding formula for public education for future voting blocs as well the old age benefit of social insurance for young, elderly and disabled alike and in particular Alien and Sedition protest for said benefits for which they do not deserve is a bit of a problem and I might add are not entitled. Not to mention the chain migration of uncle Le Roy, cousin Achmed, shirt tail relation Antiboma, not mention the Ying an Yang of it, as Ally BaBa has 40 thieving wives and 200 spring offs from precious assignations and did not pay a dime for said benefits, yet benefit. The social security office is full of them!
    Public debt is only a fraction of it being 200 and some add trillions begs the question who will pay for it. It not being those that promote such ideas of UN Americans are UN-American support such legislation of paid off politicians, need I say the demo ratic party of well paid entertainers, mostly not entertaining, including fools ball, ya know?
    And them the Repub Lie Rats, Profit over People, hold stock in the very tall walls of the Wall Street Gangsters(TAX EVASION!). That mostly by the communist economist in the aggregate squeeze out every last nickel out of the real economy and means of production of cheap ass products governed by cheap ass bean counters for cheap ass labor imported and of course exported from other communist countries for profit here and then support dumb ass legalist ration to do what? Ban Guns, presumably so you will not get shot! Your time will come! Need I say soon? Whine all you want, Mad Dog 20-20 in hind sight was the beginning and it ain’t over yet, Rover!
    So, just ask you doctor to please explain in detail just exactly what the hell does this mean? And as you probably already know, I flunked sensitivity training for which I hate even more on than the metric system, sensitivity Sensitivity and specificity are statistical measures of the performance of a binary classification test, also known in statistics as classification function:
    • Sensitivity (also called the true positive rate, the recall, or probability of detection[1] in some fields) measures the proportion of positives that are correctly identified as such (e.g. the percentage of sick people who are correctly identified as having the condition).
    • Specificity (also called the true negative rate) measures the proportion of negatives that are correctly identified as such (e.g. the percentage of healthy people who are correctly identified as not having the condition).
    What they are not telling you is them really don’t know for sure, however better than a wild ass guess, I suppose for lab rats, which just may be you, not to mention the side effects and interaction with other drugs or even some foods. Sensitivity and Specificity that! However, you should not ask your doctor if you stop eating junk not food food and drinking soda pop if you will lose weight? Well, certainly you will. But you will probably die if you did it long enough, usually about two week, I guess, but of course than you won’t need any drugs, ya know? I suppose not. So, my question is,,, are drugs and junk foods causing more medical problems than they solve, or dissolved? And is the real problem MARKETING?
    Dapagliflozin is described chemically as D-glucitol, 1,5-anhydro-1-C-[4-chloro-3-[(4-ethoxyphenyl)methyl]phenyl]-, (1S)-, compounded with (2S)-1,2-propanediol, hydrate (1:1:1). The empirical formula is C21H25ClO6•C3H8O2•H2O and the molecular weight is 502.98. The structural formula is: FARXIGA is available as a film-coated tablet for oral administration containing the equivalent of 5 mg dapagliflozin as dapagliflozin propanediol or the equivalent of 10 mg dapagliflozin as dapagliflozin propanediol, and the following inactive ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose, anhydrous lactose, crospovidone, silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate. In addition, the film coating contains the following inactive ingredients: polyvinyl alcohol, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol, talc, and yellow iron oxide.
    Before initiating FARXIGA, consider factors that may predispose patients to acute kidney injury including hypovolemia, chronic renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, and concomitant medications (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, NSAIDs). Consider temporarily discontinuing FARXIGA in any setting of reduced oral intake (such as acute illness or fasting) or fluid losses (gastrointestinal illness or excessive heat exposure); monitor patients for signs and symptoms of acute kidney injury. If acute kidney injury occurs, discontinue FARXIGA promptly and institute treatment. Just ask you doctor if he, she or it really knows anything about whatever, sensitivity or specificity you may think you have, or perhaps their advertising agency about the power of suggestion. Never mind, it probably just some sort of environ-mental disorder. So, stop breathing! That should cure it. See, that was simple, was it not?
    Here is another one that cracks me up, ”did you know that pain was cause by sensitive nerves?” No shit Shylock! I got raw nerve right here!
    It is often claimed that a highly specific test is effective at ruling in a disease when positive, while a highly sensitive test is deemed effective at ruling out a disease when negative.[7][8] This has led to the widely used mnemonics SPIN and SNOUT, according to which a highly SPecific test, when Positive, rules IN disease (SP-P-IN), and a highly ‘SeNsitive’ test, when Negative rules OUT disease (SN-N-OUT). Both rules of thumb are, however, inferentially misleading, as the diagnostic power of any test is determined by both its sensitivity and its specificity. Wee Pee
    Ya don’t say? In other words, an educated more accurate wild ass guess by as you may have guessed scientists, just ask you doctor and of course you can keep your plan if you like your plan, except for that one you may have, like it or not. Or, ask, perhaps the FDA, CDC and WHO ever else govern you pill box.
    Then, the hurricane Harvey Wine Stien show, how communist eat their own, need I say the demo ratic party, who is a bigger pig than Harvey, Billy? The “C” word, meaning communist of course being Black listed. Black List matter, ya know? Reversed the Black list that matters, which is money in the entertainment biz. Hurricane Harvey is just the tip of the ICE berg. And just exactly how did they make their money? Did they use the capitalistic system to promote communism? You bet your ass them did!
    The Hollywood blacklist—as the broader entertainment industry blacklist is generally known—was the practice of denying employment to screenwriters, actors, directors, musicians, and other American entertainment professionals during the mid-20th century because they were accused of having Communist ties or sympathies. Artists were barred from work on the basis of their alleged membership in or sympathy with the Communist Party USA or refusal to assist investigations into the party’s activities. Even during the period of its strictest enforcement, the late 1940s through the late 1950s, the blacklist was rarely made explicit or verifiable, but it directly damaged the careers of scores of individuals working in the film industry.
    Hooo, ray for Hollywood, or should I say HUAAC reversal of black list matters. All you have to do to see and hear this is pay attention to all the advertising (political pandering, Propaganda) for the various concern of the left, progressives, dummy crats, socialist which are all communist. The TV and the movies the message is the same cause for programming the populusty. One of my favor not rights is NORM, not Cheers, but Norman Lear, Meathead! Hurricane Harvey?
    The purpose of the Communists in Hollywood is not the production of political movies openly advocating Communism. Their purpose is to corrupt our moral premises by corrupting non-political movies — by introducing small, casual bits of propaganda into innocent stories — thus making people absorb the basic principles of Collectivism by indirection and implication.
    The principle of free speech requires that we do not use police force to forbid the Communists the expression of their ideas — which means that we do not pass laws forbidding them to speak. But the principle of free speech does not require that we furnish the Communists with the means to preach their ideas, and does not imply that we owe them jobs and support to advocate our own destruction at our own expense. Ayn Rand 1947.
    And if you want News Speak watch the news. The one thing they will never bring up, ever, even in discussing tax reform is withholding (FICA) which is confiscation, in other words theft. Government stealing money for a whole year and then you have to file a return(1040) to get your money back that you were over taxed for, how fair is that? Then no interest on the amount that was overtaxed and not just Federal but in my case state tax too, along with all the other property and 150 other kinds of tax, fees, fines, penalty, and licenses for various dis-services. Confiscation is not just about guns. Government is not entitled to the income of anyone and particularly when it is withheld! It is theft for political payoffs. No we should not have a conversation about that which is confiscated! Just do it. End the Government entitlement to your money, Period.
    JJJ
    PS, But the principle of free speech does not require that we furnish the Communists with the means to preach their ideas, and does not imply that we owe them jobs and support to advocate our own destruction at our own expense. Ayn Rand 1947. Perhaps, Michal More on could make a movie about that? FICA U!

    • Randolph Scott

      Joe, I wish you would start a blog site somewhere and write more. Then you would have less time to post this long wind shit here.

      • One thing I can say for him, there’s a lot of ham on that hock iffen you can gnaw yer way around it.

        The content is righteous, and obviously above a recent public school education to decipher. Most folks couldn’t absorb the content if it was written for them in crayon and the style of Dr Seuss.

        This observation isn’t pointed at you Mssr Scott. Just throwing it towards the middle of the room.

    • wendystringer48088

      Adderall is a hell of a drug. That’s my assumption. 🙂

    • I’m sorry, but I believe I missed a little – would you mind repeating that?

  2. Well, sure, you could, theoretically, but it would be much more efficient – in both cost and pour encourager les autres terms – to hogtie ’em with nylon cable wraps and run ’em over with tanks.

    • Local field expediencies are encouraged.

      • Cassandra (of Troy)

        Grenadier1,

        Jumper cables, good sized diesel truck, appropriately sized liquid conductor/metal fencing, in series super glued/zip tied left to right hands, et voila, problem uber, various & sundry follow-on critterz get a hot meal, undeniable message sent, time/personnel/materiel/costs kept to a minimum.

        A multifer!

      • 40 gallons of ‘No-Clog’ and a pre-pared pit will suffice….
        – The Leopard, Molon Labe!

        Yours in Daily Armed Liberty via anarchy!
        Northgunner III