Herschel: The Conversation Gun Controllers Need To Have With Their Wives

Courage.

Or cowardice.

Binary.

31 responses to “Herschel: The Conversation Gun Controllers Need To Have With Their Wives

  1. DWEEZIL THE WEASEL

    It is not complicated. Have a gun. Train with it. Know when you need to use it.

  2. There is nothing more disgusting than a “man” who hides behind a woman when trouble starts. This is Commiefornia and I’ve seen it. GTFU. Stop being a willing pussy; practice “Masculine Christianity”. Strength and Boldness are your friends-not acting like a 5 yro.

  3. Shinmen Takezo

    Finally a message that the “weak” Jesus ninnies need to read.

  4. Muzzle Blast

    Yes, know how and know when. Also know why – http://www.frfrogspad.com/cowards.htm

  5. Except that there is a problem with the idea being posited over there; it assumes the dude has a dick and balls and that he wants to wear them.

    Most of these “men,” we are talking about are dickless, and their wives LIKE IT THAT WAY.

    • “Most of these “men,” we are talking about are dickless, and their wives LIKE IT THAT WAY.”

      And then said wives invite a mandingo or worse into the house to ‘satisfy’ them..often in front of the man they emasculated.

      Yours in Daily Armed Liberty via anarchy!
      Northgunner III

  6. Reading WRSA for several years has convinced me that Judeo-Christianity is the original Semitic mind-weapon that was deployed against our people.

    I understand that many great people have believed deeply in their version of Christianity, including many hereos of past ages. And that many very good and moral people are deeply religious today.

    But the good done by the religion has to be weighed against the significant downsides: the endless brothers-wars based on religion that wracked Europe for ten decades, the loss of virility under successive waves of Protestant do-gooding, the weakening of the rule of the qualified, the embracing of the other-as-equal, the ruination of the minds of generations of woman — all logical follow on positions from the Abolitionist Protestantism.

    Not to mention the deliberate confusion around Zion and Israel, resulting in a few more decades of pointless wars in the Middle East, the hostile takeover of our institutions and governments by the chosen tribe.

    A healthy society doesn’t have to remind men that it’s their highest duty to prevent the woman in their orbit from being kidnapped, raped and killed. It doesn’t have to fight off dysgenic concepts like this.

    It’s true that it is as men have walked away from deep belief in God that these concepts have become stronger, not weaker, but at the same time most of them do seem to have their ultimate origin in Judeo-Christianity, and the slide into Secular Protestantism (the defacto religion of the Cloud People) seems almost inevitable, or at least highly likely given the axioms of the faith.

    • Randall Flagg

      Ain’t no such thing as Judeo-Christianity; only Judeo-Protestantism, which walked away from the one and only true belief of God a long, long time ago. In that regard, western Judeo-Protestant society is deserved of all the ill fruits it begets.

    • Watch out, you might anger some of the bible thumpers, papists and feet washers around here.

    • All Christians should learn that Zio-Christians are heretics. The whole of that idea is a late 19th and early 20th century construct.

      Jesus Christ called those we know as Jews today, “members of the synagogue of Satan”.

      The saints of the early Church were clear on who these people were, that has not changed.

      • “All Christians should…”

        What a special person you must be, to have the time to know what all Christians should do. Most people have their hands full figuring out what they themselves should do. What year did you wrap that up?

    • Indeed “Judeo-Christian” is a weaponized oxymoron.
      http://judaism.is/judeo-christian.html

      (((They))) freely admit it:

      “The thesis of this book is that Judaism and Christianity do not form a common tradition, ‘the Judeo-Christian tradition.’ They are not compatible … only now, for reasons of politics and sociology, have some representatives of Judaism maintained otherwise….”
      Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Jews and Christians: the myth of a common tradition, ISBN 1-586841-08-4, Binghamton NY: Classics in Judaic Studies

  7. A cursory check of the New Testament will reveal that the “turn the other cheek” and other self effacing statements by Christ, had to do with Christ turning out apostles who were also evangelists. The Apostles had to lead people to salvation in Christ, and were trained to suffer any indignity in order to do so. Most Christians do not understand this context, and it makes many of them into wusses. Christ Himself suffered all sorts of indignities and degradation in order to fulfill His Mission. No Christian outside of being a minister has to go the route of non-violence, period. My wife had her epiphany, and now she’s going to carry and is more involved on her own with preps and training. When I first met her, she was all meek and mild, but I think now she is ready to be all she can be. She’s always had good common sense, but when it came to guns and self-defense, she was lukewarm. Not so anymore. It just took a while.

  8. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.

  9. A big strapping country lad married a beautiful woman back in the day, and after the ceremony, loaded her into his carriage, to be pulled to their new home together by his big Missouri mule.
    Partway there, when they were to cross a creek, the mule brayed in complaint, refused to budge, and required all the gent’s persuasive powers and a firm application of the whip to get it to cross.
    “That’s one.” he said aloud, as they continued on.

    The newlyweds continued towards their home, but when they came to a wooden bridge across a gully, the mule again halted, braying in protest even more loudly than the first time, and it took a sound thrashing with the whip to finally get it to cross over the small divide and continue along the way.
    “That’s two” he noted, as he climbed back onto the seat with his radiant bride.

    Finally, they crested the last small hill, but at the swampy bottomland before his own meadow, yet again the mule dug in, kicking and braying even louder than the first two times.
    “That’s three!” he said, and reaching into his coat, withdrew a big Colt revolver, took quick aim, and dropped the mule instantly with one quick shot straight to the head.

    Whereupon his new wife, aghast, unloaded on her new husband.
    “That’s horrible!” she cried out. “I can’t believe you’re such a hard, heartless man as to shoot down a defenseless animal like that! I can’t believe I had to witness such a horribly cruel display, and I’m utterly shocked that you actually brought a pistol to our wedding and had it hidden underneath your Sunday coat all this time! I simply will not abide any further bloodthirsty displays of such wanton brutality by any husband of mine!”
    Her new husband holstered his pistol and remained silent, staring coolly at his new wife, which infuriated her even more, doubly so because her expressions of outrage weren’t having at all the effect she’d intended.
    “I can’t believe you’re just standing there! Haven’t you got anything at all to say for yourself?” she wailed.

    As he unhitched the dead mule and picked up the traces of the carriage, he looked her straight in the eyes and said, “That’s one…”

  10. John (Northern Rockies)

    Sean:

    Right on. The instruction was “for the moment” and that’s all.

    Here’s a comment I wrote on another piece this morning:

    Over 95% of modern-day “Jews” are not Semites, oft times referred to as “Ashkenazi Jews.”. They are creatures from the Asian steppes known as Khazars and have absolutely nothing in common with the Israelites of the Bible. This has been a “known known” since the late 800’s made into a “known unknown” by the Khazarians themselves and unfortunately, modern Christians mezmerized by their lies and influential power. Even D.N.A. tests have proven the above to be the case.

    Let’s allow their own words printed in the 1905 Encyclopedia Judaica to stand and provide the needed element of conviction: “It would be a mistake to assume that our roots are of the Israelites of the Old testament, but, rather, our roots are in Phariseeism.”

    Deductions?

    A. They are not the “Jews” of the Bible, but that <5% does have some biblical lineage. What is it?

    B. From the same source: "Edom is in Jewry", stated by "America's Rabbi" Steven Wise. Edomites are the descendants of Esau, he and his descendants being "damned forever" by God Himself. The Sephardic Judaists are the group that "converted" the Khazars at the request of the Khazar King Bulan after he learned of the faith and are composed of the Edomites, Cannanites and Kenites – all three "damned forever" by God.

    You perhaps have heard the phrase "lost in translation" before, and the word "Jew" that first pops up in the "Book of Kings" would be one of those words. The proper word would have been "Judahite" to describe said "tribe" rather than the word "Jew" and the "House of Judah", which also included the Tribe of Benjamin should have always been referred to as The House of Judah. Period.

    As argued, that word was first translated incorrectly to describe the Tribe of Judah and then shortly thereafter, The House of Judah. Later and even more egregiously, the translation/use of the word in the New Testament wrongly described every resident of Judea shortly preceeding, during and then shortly following the time of Christ as a "Jew" in spite of the fact Judea's population at the time included Romans, Greeks, Babylonians, Egyptians, Smaritans, Assyrians, et.al. (think of the present amalgalm of people in N.Y.C. as a comparison. Judea was "cosmopolitan" at the time given its geographic location on trade routes as well as a result of the variety of peoples who had conquered it over the last few hundred years).

    Got it?

    The dominant religion in Judea at the time was Phariseeism, the antecendent to what we know today as Judaism. Again from Rabbi Steven Wise: "Phariseeism became Medievial Rabbinism which became Modern Jewry."

    To demonstrate the dominance of the non-Israelites in Judea even in the non-religious sphere, the Gospels of both Matthew and Luke clearly identify King Herod as an Edomite/Idumean as well did Flavious Josephus in Chapter 12 of his tome, "The History of the Jews." As further confirmation of this fact, we'll go back a tad historically to The Book of Ezekial (25:14) with the following: ""I will lay My vengeance on Edom by the hand of My people Israel. Therefore, they will act in Edom according to My anger and according to My wrath; thus they will know My vengeance," declares the Lord GOD."

    Obviously these folks are not one and the same, therefore we have been lied to (quite successfully) by the Judaists as well as by our own pastors and priests.

    Remember the following if you wish to understand and not fall for "the leaven of the Pharisees":

    Judahite: member of the Tribe of Judah
    Judaist: A practitioner of Judaism (see above for Rabbi's Wise's etiology)
    Jew/Judean – Anyone living in Judea during the period discussed above regardless of race, religious belief or national origin

    Matthew 15:24 – "I am not sent but to the lost sheep of the House of Israel." And when the apostles were told to go and "feed my sheep", where did they go? Europe. It's right there in "Acts", so who are the "Chosen People?"

    We are. Not the Judaists. We should start acting like it.

    2 Corinthians 6:17 – "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord…" When was the last time your preacher or priest bothered to act like a man, be politically incorrect and both read and discuss that passage truthfully? My bet is that it has never happened.

    "Thinking is hard work, which is why so few do it." – Henry Ford

    "Be ye not decieved." – God

  11. I don’t know what Jesus thought about anything. I do know that I will shoot. I know that I will keep shooting until the enemy is dead. I know that I won’t feel bad about it. As for the rest I am not a follower of Jesus so …… I have no power over the universe. Heaven/hel or Vallhalla , or the long cold dark. I don’t get a choice and never did. I do get to chose how I respond to violence. I chose to kill. If that pisses G_D off. Then he/she/it, fucked up when they built the place.

  12. The Usual Suspect

    Your life is Gods gift to you, to allow someone to take it
    or your families without a fight is a sin.

  13. I spoke with my Greek Orthodox priest about blessing our self defense weapons and those of us that would employ them.

    He had no problem with that at all.

  14. Just as in the beginning, with Eve falling for the lie of the Devil, so are women more prone to accept the satanic lies of “spiritual wickedness in high places” who want us disarmed while they are surrounded by armed security. And like Eve, they try yo push it on their husbands and many men accept it in craven appeasement.

  15. For all of you anti-Jewish assholes on this thread, your hatred is only exceeded by your ignorance.

    Judaism – as written in the Torah and the Talmud (part of which is the Oral Law handed down to Moses, which was written down only after the 2nd Temple fell and there was great concern that it would be lost to history – the rest being questions, analysis and commentary on that Oral Torah) is VERY, VERY clear: to save a life is the greatest virtue. From a theological P.O.V., one cannot do good deeds if one is dead, nor pass them on to your family if they are dead (or never born in the first place). You may violate ANY law to save a life, except that you may not renounce G-d, and you may not murder another innocent human being intentionally.

    Three times in Jewish history it was very clear that the Jews were armed – when they came out of Egypt, when the Persians tried to murder them all and they resisted by killing 75,000 of their would-be murderers (commemorated by the holiday of Purim), and at Chanukah, when Judah Maccabbee and his forces (what we’d call a militia) threw out the Syrian Greeks who had defiled the Temple. Israel since before its independence in 1948 fought to exist and survive, and now no one in the area has a chance to defeat it.

    As for me, I have and will retain my faith in the One True G-d, and trust Him implicitly – all the while knowing that He gave us a brain, hands and the ability to reason, so I’m responsible to do all that is humanly possible to help myself and my family before even daring to call upon Him for a miracle or favor of any kind. What that means, is that I’m armed – well armed.

    Take your theories about Judaism, as well as your theories about the racial origin of today’s Jews, and stick’em where the Sun don’t shine. As for the liberal/Leftist Jews…I can assure you that they fail to understand the teachings of their religion (if they even care about it, that is) in just the same way that the uber-pacifist Christians fail to understand THEIR religion. Frankly, for both sets of those folks, liberalism or Leftism is their religion, not what they may say is the religion of their families going back generations.

    Like what I say, or agree with it – fine, and thank you. Don’t – well, I don’t give a rat’s ass. Just don’t come to bother me, and you’ll have a much better chance of living to your full life expectancy.

    • Fuck off, kike.

      Jews are a race and their defects are abundant and obvious.

    • Your critique is like a fresh breeze blowing away the fetid stench of reprobate manure . Standing alone and immovable beside our Creator while the winds of the anti-Christ gust and spew blasphemy . Stand strong and with honor and know that there are a few that have not bowed to Baal and realize that we are grafted on to the vine .

  16. Mountain Cracker

    Ugh here we go with “baby jew” Jesus again. Fuck that guy. His followers have shoved us over the cliff. And I don’t care what “baby jew” said in the gospels about me owning a rifle or my innate right to self-defense. The Romans were on the right side of that. Oh look we’re in a disintegrating culture too…any statements on the similarities with Rome’s from the “cult of baby jew?”

  17. God is a cruel master.

    I truly hope he is amused…