Ivan Is Coming

Via FreeZoxee.

38 responses to “Ivan Is Coming

  1. Alfred E. Neuman

    Reblogged this on FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.

  2. Ivan isn’t our (((gun control problem))).


    • SemperFi, 0321

      First we had the Cold War, then the Blue Helmets, now it’s back to the Russians and Chinese invading our shores. One need look no further than those that occupy Hollywood, Wall St. and D.C., that’s the real enemy.
      But the American people have proven they’re content chasing squirrels.

      • European American

        However, having said that, there is a reason the dark energy fueling the Zionists chose “the chosen ones”: History.
        They don’t care for anyone outside of their tribe, which may be why they were expelled from over a hundred countries since 250AD. Was it because they were to “pure” and others resented that? Or just the opposite! I suggest reading the Talmud and finding out yourself.

        The genius of the Jews is to live off people, not off the land, nor off the production of commodities from raw materials, but off people. Let other people till the soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller. Let other people toil at trades and manufacture; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work. That is his particular genius. If this genius be described as parasitic, the term would seem to be justified.”

        “The Jewish nation is the only nation that possesses the secrets of all the rest…there is no government in the world so completely at their service as America. ‘The British did this…the Germans did that’ when it was the International Jew who actually did it.”

        “The Americans are (now known as) a sordid, greedy, cruel people. Why? Because Jewish money-power is centered here.”

        –Henry Ford, Sr

    • wendystringer48088

      God Bless the Jews.

      As I understand it, the mother of Jesus was a Jewish woman..

      • The word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a Pharisee, a Khazar, or talmudic “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bastard of a whore boiling in shit as “Jews” insist.

        In his The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed, drills every single one of those points home on p. 59 ff:

        Click to access TheControversyOfZion.pdf

        • You can also use what I have been told, Mary and got did not have intercourse so Mary basically carried Jesus like a surrogate mother, so therefore even though his mother was a Jew he was not due to not sharing any dna. Jesus also denied being king of the Jews and as John 8:44 he says the Jews are from their father the devil… and we know his father is god within the trinity. You are absolutely correct that modern Jews are Karzars

      • Charley Waite

        That’s Mary Magdalene, not Mary Mother of Jesus

  3. Oddly enough, don’t have a gun control issue, never have, well their was 86?. knew then that all I had to do was wait them out. Even then I didn’t know anybody who complied with it.

    And I don’t know any jewwwwwwwwws, so I’m not worried!.

    Love the above pic, this kids adapted the tools available for
    his needs. Shoot scoot, hide!. UN my ass. Partisan Mountain fighter, to the bone.


    • “..And I don’t know any jewwwwwwwwws, so I’m not worried!.

      Love the above pic, this kids adapted the tools available for
      his needs. Shoot scoot, hide!. UN my ass. Partisan Mountain fighter, to the bone…”

      You may not know any “jewwwwwwwwws”, but those in
      banking, ‘media/infrotainment’, ‘academia’ and ‘gov’ are
      VERY interested not only in you but everyone here.

      Count on it…..

      Yes,….love for a communist? ‘Partisan Mountain fighter’ or not,
      still a murderous meatbag tool for the communist jews that
      infected both Russia and Hungary (at least in Hungary’s case
      they were thoroughly bloodied and driven back out by the
      Romanians of the day..sent Bela Kun running back to Trotsky
      and company back in Moscow!).

      And you attempt to give me hartburn over speaking truth about
      “The Bad War” but commie jew trained and controlled shits
      like that get an automatic ‘atta-boy!’ and pass from you?….

      Speaks volumes without having to say anything else….

      More like murderous little commie shithead to the bone!

      NorthGunner – The Truth Is It’s OWN Defense!

  4. Patrick Shannon

    In spite of the meme quip, that’s a heck of an impressive photo. Some research indicates it’s a Soviet partisan of WW2, equipped with two M1895 Nagant Revolvers, one PPD-40, two RGD-33 AP grenades, three F1 AP grenades, and one RPG-43 HEAT grenade.

  5. it









    not a Russian troop

    • All too true. But unfortunalely a vast number of people pledge alligance to the badge. As you say a very bad mistake!!

  6. This Alynski-ite Clinton regime clown and his star chamber court palace coup flea circus is not helping.


  7. Ivan ain’t gonna like Yamamoto’s 2nd Amendment doctrine about going after the dirt people best summed up by Simo’s most excellent use of iron sight rifles and the 100 Heads Long range Casualty & Life Insurance Co.

  8. wendystringer48088

    Won’t be that Russian guy (looks like he has a mix of various WW2 guns and grenades and rifle ammo that doesn’t fit any of his guns and is wearing a civilian coat so maybe a resistance fighter of some sort – or is the product of someone going crazy with photo-shop).

    It will be these guys…

    Gun Confiscation 101: “Red Flag” laws are really just “glorified SWAT-ing”


    • “…shot, beaten, tortured, knifed, burned, starved, frozen, crushed, or worked to death; buried alive, hung, bombed, or killed in any other of the myriad ways governments have inflicted death on unarmed, helpless citizens and foreigners.”
      Rummel RJ. Death by Government. London: Transaction Publishers. 1994. Chapter 1.

  9. A public Service Announcement…

    Might be suitable for milk cartons.
    Have you seen them?

    Couple good ones are trying to help.
    Key word: A couple.

    Not that it matters, the well prepared and aware among us know no one is coming to save us but us.

    Just curious. Because my share of all that treasure I had no choice of how much or what it went for, it is my wealth after all no matter what some jerk off says, lot of bucks wasted, sure would have been nice to use in defending my self family and Liberty, instead of on lining the pockets of the neo-con-artists kleptocracy and the 12 Bankster family cartel’s gold vaults with blood money.

    I hear they still are running around 3rd world shitholes, killing “insurgents” and other targets the empire deems for liquidation.
    Interesting, because I wonder often, is part of keeping special forces in active combat operations for more than a generation in a shitty little country for more than the riches of the opium crop, like maybe this instrument of plunder and repression of indigenous agrarian and provincial dirt people, their religious ideology not withstanding, will this same empire be bringing this military weapon home to do its bidding on home soil, for similar reasons?

    I don’t doubt the bravery and principles of such warriors. They put their pants on one leg at a time as I do. Therefore it is probably not much more difficult to deceive warriors as us non-SF warriors. Fact is a whole shitload of us got conned big time.

    Its where the rubber meets the road matters. Solders come in all makes and models like none military people. There will be some who will do whatever they are ordered to do, it is Tom Baugh’s “When to Shoot the Colonels” critical thinking: https://starvingthemonkeys.com/articles/Colonels.html

    Is Ivan the worst possible thing?
    After all, weaponizing everything government, and not government via corporate treason & tyranny, is a Oligarchy thing. They love it. Look at the remodeling the FBI and DOJ has gone through, the “intelligence” agencies, Amazon’s, Faceborg’s, Twatter’s, collusion with the peeping fucking pervert payroll patriots. Weaponizing is the new tyranny.

    They already have weaponized and up armored civilian police forces. They got their shiny armored cars. Night vision, belt feds, COIN tactics, dress rehearsal’s pretend fighting domestic “insurgents” and various multi state interdiction exercises.

    The obvious is bring those “Free From Tyranny” boys back home intact as fully operational.

    Think this is far fetched?

    Look at this then:

    Tanks at Waco
    (this happened in America. i watched it live. i could not fathom the depths of depravity and evil at the time. something was beyond terribly wrong. everything was off kilter. WTF is going on. burn Christian’s to death? this was a the result of the Clinton regime of terror. it began when those two scumbags won by margin of vote fraud. they brought false flag, and crisis as a means into a political art form and instrument of nudging millions in the desired direction. before 1990 this instrument of social engineering was used sparingly, if at all. those two homicidal psychopaths used it like it was toilet paper. think they have that supposed trail of 1200 plus Clinton Dead behind them? think again friends. Its tens of thousands and still rising. its the nouveau rich/powerful way. this is but a tiny part of “Ivan” we will see if shit don’t back down)


    (in the un-croped originals from the series of shots of these FBI “Rescue” team members trophy pics, there are remains of dead babies. I have them but can’t locate them in the file they are in right now, 75 woman & children burnt to carbonized remains. some heroes. these folks did nothing. they where deliberately set up. and still refused to be entrapped in fake weapons violations. so exactly like Mueller and his “special counsel” they simply make something upon and then create a “criminal”. don’t believe it? Mueller Comey and whats the puke Trump nominated for the DOJ?, was running the FBI when this happened. Janet Reno and Eric Holder ran the DOJ. all was involved in Waco. Guess who they worked for? Bingo. The Clinton regime. care to guess the characters behind the assassinations of the million bikers on DC at that restaurant in Waco? )

    Sure he is a great figure in all this. Neo-Bolsheviks like antifa new summer jobs program after Trump? Ivan’s worthy of this evil when properly watered and cared for.

    But who needs enemies like Ivan when we got a government full of weaponized amerika-inski ivan’s with itchy trigger fingers and an entire carreer of protecting his nice comfy nest eggs garnered for utmost subservience to the state in the Amerikan Nomenklaturer jobs welfare program called federal employment he has secured through his part in strip mining our republic.
    Just pick out the craziest.
    The died in the wool sycophants.

    Instant Ivan!

    • liberate the oppressed- huh?

      more like liberate the drugs, oil, and gold from turd world shitholes while fucking everything up for those left to fend for themselves.

      where are they?

      they are either peddling coffee, worthless trinkets, making retarded videos… or actively training to supplement and support the blue bellies and feds during round-ups and assassinations of dissenters, deplorables, and gun owners- hey, a guy has to make a living still right? otherwise, we would be reading about Fusan HVTs gone missing and key leftist politicians and activists being found tied-up and hung wearing signs around their necks- but, we’re not…

      prepare accordingly.

  10. Nicely accessorised. Dressed to pa-tay. All he needs now is a bowtie ;}

  11. I don’t see that he has anything to shoot the belt ammo. Carrying for the squad auto?


    • SemperFi, 0321

      Appears to be German belt (rimless ammo in metal MG34/42 belt. Most Soviet belts were still canvas). A full belt was 250 rds in 50 rd sections, so this may be a studio prop.
      Besides, who’d want to be running with that load and get smacked in the nuts repeatedly by that hand grenade?
      I’d sure kill for that PPsh though.

  12. Kind of puts me in the mind of those old time photo booths in an amusement park. I see no musette, satchel or bandolier to carry ammo for the zipper, a belt load of cartridges that don’t go in any of his hardware. Top that with a couple of smoke wagons and maybe a pocket full of loose cartridges he can’t dig out with his mittens on. It’s right up there with 1859 silver plates here before shit got real. Bet there’s a pot load of pics with different faces and the same stuff.

  13. Pingback: Link Fest 2-10-18 | Dirt People

  14. And what I’m trying to explain to people is that it won’t be “Ivan”. It’ll “Bob” or “Joe”, the sheriff’s deputies that live in your neighborhood. Bob and Joe WILL follow their orders.

  15. Do your own research and ask through the Son for discernment in all.
    Catholic Professor Orestes Brownson, Brownson’s Review (January, 1854): 90:

    But is it the intention of the pope to possess this country? Undoubtedly. In this intention is he aided by the Jesuits and all the Catholic prelates and priests? Undoubtedly, if they are faithful to their religion.iii

    Hector MacPherson, The Jesuits in History (Edinburgh: Macniven and Wallace, 1914): 52, 85, 100:

    …that the Jesuits were actively plotting for the extermination of Protestantism was no fiction of Oates, but a most certain and deadly fact…

    At the Reformation the Irish race remained Romanist; and the miseries which came upon it must be in the main traced to the Jesuits, who used Ireland as a factor in their scheme of overthrowing the Protestantism of England and establishing a Roman Catholic dynasty completely under the control of the Papacy.

    …wherever the Jesuits went, they placed the worldly prosperity and the political influence of their Order above all religious considerations. In accordance with their secret policy they set themselves to gain influence at Court; and, in order to carry their point, they were willing to countenance assassination, sedition, etc.

    Pope John Paul II, in his apostolic letter Ad Tuendam Fidem (May 18, 1998), made bold statements about the need for submission to the Pope on doctrinal issues. He declared that lack of submission was worthy of punishment:

    Whoever denies or places in doubt any truth that must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or repudiates the Christian faith as a whole, and does not come to his senses after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished as a heretic…whoever obstinately rejects a teaching that the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops, exercising the authentic Magisterium, have set forth to be held definitively, or who affirms what they have condemned as erroneous, and does not retract after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished with an appropriate penalty.

    One of the doctrinal issues the Papacy demands submission on is the keeping of Sunday. Pope John Paul II said this, in agreement with Ad Tuendam Fidem:

    A person who violates the sanctity of Sunday is to be punished as a heretic.iv

    Pope Nicholas I in a letter to the King of Bulgaria in 860 AD:

    I glorify you for having maintained your authority by putting to death those wandering sheep who refused to enter the fold; and you not only have not sinned, by showing a holy rigour, but I even congratulate you on having opened the kingdom of heaven to the people submitted to your rule. A king need not fear to command massacres, when these will retain his subjects in obedience, or cause them to submit to the faith of Christ; and God will reward him in this world, and in eternal life, for these murders.

    Pope Urban II’s address in Clermont, France in November 1095:

    If you must have blood, bathe in the blood of infidels. Soldiers of hell, become soldiers of the living God!

    Pope Leo VIII, Immortale Dei (November 1, 1885):

    The unrestrained freedom of thinking and of openly making known one’s thoughts is not inherent in the rights of citizens and is by no means worthy of favor and support (emphasis added).

    Pope Pius IX, Quanta Cura (December 8, 1864):

    Which false and perverse opinions [of democracy and individual freedom] are on that ground the more to be detested, because they chiefly tend to this, that that salutary influence be impeded and (even) removed, which the Catholic Church, according to the institution and command of her Divine Author, should freely exercise even to the end of the world — not only over private individuals, but over nations, peoples, and their sovereign princes; and (tend also) to take away that mutual fellowship and concord of counsels between Church and State which has ever proved itself propitious and salutary, both for religious and civil interests…

    From which totally false idea of social government they do not fear to foster that erroneous opinion, most fatal in its effects on the Catholic Church and the salvation of souls, called by Our Predecessor, Gregory XVI, an “insanity,”2 viz., that “liberty of conscience and worship is each man’s personal right, which ought to be legally proclaimed and asserted in every rightly constituted society; and that a right resides in the citizens to an absolute liberty, which should be restrained by no authority whether ecclesiastical or civil, whereby they may be able openly and publicly to manifest and declare any of their ideas whatever, either by word of mouth, by the press, or in any other way (emphasis added).

    The Syllabus of Errors Condemned by Pope Pius IX (December 8, 1864) lists several statements that the Pope called erroneous. Here are a few statements condemned by Pope Pius IX:

    15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.

    24. The Church has not the power of using force, nor has she any temporal power, direct or indirect.

    77. In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.

    The English Roman Catholic newspaper The Rambler (September 1852):

    Shall I hold out hopes to the Protestant that I will not meddle with his creed, if he will not meddle with mine? Shall I lead him to think that religion is a matter for private opinion, and tempt him to forget that he has no more right to his religious views than he has to my purse, or my house, or my life blood? No! Catholicism is the most intolerant of creeds. It is intolerance itself, for it is the truth itself. We might as rationally maintain that two and two does not make four as the theory of Religious Liberty. Its impiety is only equaled by its absurdity.”

    Catholic World (August 1871): 735:

    We do not accept it [i.e., the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America], or hold it to be any government at all…If the American Republic is to be sustained and preserved at all, it must be by the rejection of the principle of the [Protestant] Reformation, and the acceptance of the Catholic principle…

    “Faith,” The Catechism of the Catholic Church (Liguori Publications, 1994): 507:

    Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same;…. schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion wiht the members of the Church subject to him.

    Civilta Cattolica (House organ of the Jesuits):

    Fascism is the regime that corresponds most closely to the concepts of the Church of Rome.

    Western Watchman (A Roman Catholic publication out of St. Louis):

    The [Roman Catholic] church has persecuted. Only a tyro [i.e., novice] in church history will deny that…one hundred and fifty years after [Roman Emperor] Constantine, the Donatists were persecuted and sometimes put to death…Protestants were persecuted in France and Spain with the full approval of the [Roman Catholic] church authorities…When she [i.e., the Roman Catholic Church] thinks it good to use physical force, she will use it.”

    Protestantism is not a religion…never was a religion. The most that could be said about it was that it was a form of rape and robbery masquerading as a religion.

    Father Charles Chiniquy, The Priest, The Woman and the Confessional (BiblioBazaar, 2007): 104:

    Have not the popes publicly and repeatedly anathematized the sacred principle of Liberty of Conscience? Have they not boldly said, in the teeth of the nations of Europe, that Liberty of Conscience must be destroyed – killed at any cost? Has not the whole world heard the sentence of death to liberty coming from the lips of the old man of the Vatican?”

    Catholic Encyclopedia volume 14 (1911): 767-768:

    There is no graver offense than heresy… and therefore it must be rooted out with fire and sword.

    David Hunt, A Woman Rides the Beast (Harvest House, 1994): 126:

    The Constitution of the United States was condemned by the Papacy because it separated church and state and prohibited the establishment of any religion by the government. The popes, on the other hand, had long required governments to make Roman Catholicism the official religion and to prohibit the practice of any other.

    Dr. William P. Grady:

    During a sermon in 1850, [Roman Catholic] Archbishop John Hughes of New York, the nation’s leading Vatican spokesman, acknowledged that a conspiracy to subjugate free America did exist after all. The Catholic press was ecstatic. An excerpt from ‘Shepherd of the Valley’, the official journal of the [Roman Catholic] Bishop of St. Louis, declared, ‘If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, so we believe.’ [Catholic Archbishop] Hughes’ own paper, the ‘New York Freeman’ brazenly announced, ‘No man has a right to choose his religion.’

    Bill Hughes, The Secret Terrorists (Truth Triumphant Ministries): 138:

    For over 200 years, the goal [of the Jesuits] has been the complete destruction of the United States Constitution…In the religious arena, the goal of the Jesuits is to wipe out any trace of Protestantism and other religions, and to restore worldwide domination by the pope.

    Darryl Eberhart, “The Papacy’s Hatred of Liberty,” Tackling the Tough Topics:

    …the Papacy, despite its “ecumenical rhetoric”, has not changed a bit over the many centuries in the following categories:

    * Its deep hatred of Jews, all independent Bible-believing Christians, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians (as recently as the 1940s we find Roman Catholic Ustashi military units in Croatia, led and urged on by Franciscan priests, monks, and friars, slaughtering from 600,000 to one million innocent Serb Orthodox Christian men, women, elderly, and children – many of the victims being first brutally tortured);
    * Its long-held dream to bring all Christians under its monopolistic, totalitarian, ecclesiastical control;
    * Its long-held dream to head up a totalitarian one-world religious organization; and,
    * Its long-held dream to bring all world leaders – especially those in “Christian” countries – under the temporal power of the pope.

    Charles Chiniquy, a Catholic priest who turned to Protestantism, warns America about these aggressive intentions of the Papacy:

    Those bloody and anti-social laws of Rome, after having covered Europe with ruins, tears and blood, for ten centuries, have crossed the oceans to continue their work of slavery and desolation, blood and tears, ignorance and demoralization, on this continent. Under the mask and name of Democracy, they have raised the standard of rebellion of the South against the North, and caused more than a half million of the most heroic sons of America to fall on the fields of carnage.

    In a very near future, if God does not miraculously prevent it, those laws of dark deeds and blood will cause the prosperity, the rights, the education, and the liberties of this too confident nation, to be buried under a mountain of smoking and bloody ruins. On the top of that mountain, Rome will raise her throne and plant her victorious banners.

    Then she will sing her Te Deums and shout her shouts of joy, as she did, when she heard the lamentations and cries of desolation of the millions of martyrs burning in the five thousand auto-da-fes she had raised in all the capitals and great cities of Europe.v

    i. Darryl Eberhart, “Deceitful Revisers,” Tackling the Tough Topics (January 20, 2006).

    ii. Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno (1931): 48.

    iii. As quoted in J. M’Clintock (ed.), The Methodist Quarterly Review Volume 37 (New York: Carleton & Phillips, 1855): 78.

    iv. Detroit News (July 7, 1998): A1.

    v. Charles Chiniquy, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome (Chicago: Adam Craig, 1889): 687.

    “Without the belief in the resurrection the Christian Faith could not have come into being.” ~ William Lane Craig
    Science Deceptions
    Media Deceptions

    • ^—- The winner of today’s most meaningless non sequitur.

      • SemperFi, 0321

        And how is this any different than arguing over Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings?
        Egomaniacs posing as self proclaimed experts on ancient writings they can’t substantiate as fact. Exactly how many translations are there in how many languages based on how many original sources? Verified by whom? I know someone out there already has an answer for this.

    • Someone needs to get his own blog. I skipped 90% of that. Some linked articles I will read all the way through, but I don’t have the time (or attention span) to read comments that long.

      It’s been recommended to me (took a blog writing class once, FWIW) that blog posts stay below 500 words, comments on blogs should certainly be similar if not shorter. Based on studies of how much people read and stuff.

  16. You all want to stand in a circle and point at the jews the muslims, and each other, well then so be it!

    • Exactly. Anything except pointing to themselves and the white elite who have convinced them that its all someone else’s fault.

  17. Ivan doesn’t want to come around here. If he does he’ll never leave.