The Cowardice Of Moral Ambiguity

Via JJ at AP.

You are going to have to shoot and kill Communists.

Some of those people you will know.

If you can’t discipline yourself to cut carbs and go ruck a couple of times per week, how are you going to shoot Aunt Sally, who leads the Feral Migrant Importation Cabal in your community?

Harden your hearts.

Toughen your bodies.

But first, get your mind right.

21 responses to “The Cowardice Of Moral Ambiguity

  1. robroysimmons

    Nothing sadder than an obese tough talking Boomercon or GenXcon who can’t do two flights of stairs without weezing.

    I know a guy who owns just about every civvie version of a standard Nato mag fed rifle or carbine, tough talking kill em all type, really can’t do two flights and is going to die a broken man. He never broke out of the cargo cult net trap they set for us, don’t be that guy.

  2. This includes the current POTUS and his lackeys. I’m now reading about his efforts to sell the Saudis nukes. Even Obama wasn’t that brazen.

    • lastmanstanding

      MIC needs the money.

      He will do as told…fuck the rest of us. His life has been one big con/rape of humanity.

      You all know good and gd well that he was a reg at Epstein’s island.

      • Johnny Paratrooper

        I find this hard to believe.

        If Trump was dirty, he would sound like Bush/Obama, and they wouldn’t be having a fucking aneurysm on TV every day.

    • Far as the Saudis getting the bomb, that cat was let out of the bag a long time ago, when the West – primarily so-called allies such as France, Germany and others sold the necessary fissile material and technology to Pakistan to permit Dr. A.Q. Khan – the “Father of the Islamic Bomb” – and his associates to build a workable atomic device.

      Once India joined the nuclear club, arch-rival and sometime enemy Pakistan had to do so herself at all costs. And once the Islamic Republic of Pakistan got the bomb, it was only a matter of time before other Muslim nations got ahold of the technology. The watershed moment for Saudi Arabia is when Iran got nuclear technology. Riyadh was not going to sit silently by as Tehran got nukes and left them without any.

      The Saudis probably already have at least one nuclear device, perhaps more, albeit not publicly and on the strict QT. Probably from the aforementioned Pakis or the Israelis (yeah, strange world, right?) or perhaps from their new friends the Chinese. People with the kind of money the sheiks have wouldn’t have that tough a time getting one.

  3. jessie doth protest too much. no one can force their version of decency on another without blowback. maybe humanity as we all know it has run its course?

    all things do indeed end.

    maybe a great cull is needed to start over, saving only the smartest and strongest genetics for a new beginning. rid the world of the weak of mind and frail of body. relying on ancient beliefs in imaginary deities is not the future. and the current police state- lawfare tactics are not either. who really wants to forced to obey some ruling-class assholes who are insulated from the reality of their wishes?

    • That sounds very Lenin-ish Tfat. History will repeat, we dump these assclowns, only to have a new crop of loosers come out on top.

      The strong should only count on themselves to get their folks thru, to go out and save strong genetics, is once again some (one’s), playing god.

      It’s simple you prepare, you do what you have to survive, by your own skills. Those ARE, the strong.

      Teach your children well!

      DW

    • Well, the real god is the Sun, and there is a grand solar minimum coming in now which is going to massively reduce food production, and make the north habitable only to those with thin nostrils, and who cogitate sufficiently to plan ahead. It will be a great time to kill off the weak…and killed they will be.

  4. I’m sure that plenty of people on the Right do have a grand vision of the future, but without power they have no way of implementing it. IMO, it’s more of a power issue than it is a grand vision issue.
    Game of Thrones – Power is Power

    • Slowly but surely people are waking up to that fact…Now when they figure out Power only comes through dedicated numbers working in concert towards a goal well then maybe we can start winning…

    • Well yes and no. Cersi was quite wrong about something. She gives orders and her men obey, but why?
      Little Finger has power as well. He does not have the overt power that Cersi has because she is the “queen” but he has power none the less.
      Overt power comes when people attain a position of legitimacy (the Queen).
      When they give directions people follow them because there is a stated overt arrangement in place. Do this because you believe that I am giving you legitimate directions (within the law) or do this because if you do not this consequence will happen. It could even be do this because you are loyal to me and do not require a specific reward, but as legitimacy erodes the consequences of NOT carrying out the directions diminish and the implied loyalty disappears.
      People are “loyal” to Little Finger only as so much as he continues to reward them. His power is covert because it relies solely on the payment of a reward for the actions taken. Men and Women will not act for him simply because he asks or demands, he lacks legitimacy. They act because he pays them or threatens them with harm if they do not. When his payments are not enough or his threats are not carried out, his power is gone.
      The only real difference is overt power is carried out in the open and it is seen to be legitimate and official where as covert power is in the shadows and is seen to be illegitimate.
      It still really boils down to people acting based on the consequences, either positive or negative.

      There is that legitimacy thing again.

      FreeFor does not have legitimacy in the minds of the majority.
      So we will have to act in the shadows until we do.
      That requires Money or Threats, things we seem to lack in sufficient quantities to achieve anything for now .

  5. The world is not black and white, there are many shade of grey and countless variations of colors. Define moral ambiguity. Your morals or mine? The liberals aka: leftists are very quick to defame and destroy anyone not of their ideology, their concept of ‘morality’ which is their marxist ideology, allows them to attack and harm without compunction. The ends justify the means and the end is complete enslavement to totalitarian systems.

    I abhor extremes, ditto fanatics. The middle way for me.

    I also know and acknowledge right from wrong and do not accept the unacceptable. What is unacceptable? In part: Infanticide, rape, torture, murder, cruelty, pedophilia and grooming children to be catamites or sex slaves, beastiality, and the other parts of the commandments of thou shall not

    . Christians are punished by the left because they have a moral compass to follow. Allah allows for all the depravity so Islam is acceptable

    People who twist and turn and attempt to ;make excuses for unacceptable behaviours are unacceptable.

  6. Seeing events as “two worlds and a big bang event”, I think
    there is a major struggle between the two before they
    collide as we are witnessing now.

    I relay the following to rub some brain cells together
    and see if you see light at the end of that tunnel:

    “A U.S. foreign policy that provides the opportunity for fully-realized national authenticity is a paradigm shift amid a world that has grown accustomed to corrupt globalists, bankers and financial elites who have established a business model by dictating terms to national leaders they control and influence. We have our own frame of reference with K-Street lobbyists in Washington DC. Much of President Trump’s global trade reset is based on confronting these multinational influence agents.”
    In its entirety here:
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/02/25/the-trump-doctrine/

    “Every man to his family and his possessions”

    “Then Jesus said unto them, Yet a little while is the light with you. Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you: for he that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth”

  7. {{{Christians are punished by the left because they have a moral compass to follow}}}.

    Christians and Conservatives:

    Tolerate + Acquiescence = Aiding or contributing in a secondary way or assisting in or contributing to as a subordinate.

    {{{Moral compass}}}.

    Do not think that I have come to bring peace upon the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. – Jesus

    Then He said to them, But now let him who has a purse take it, and also [his provision] bag; and let him who has no sword sell his mantle and buy a sword. – Jesus

    What Boobus Amerikanus Churchians think Jesus is:

    Forever baby doe-eyed Jesus.

    So also faith, if it does not have works (deeds and actions of obedience to back it up), by itself is destitute of power (inoperative, dead).

    • Documentary: Protestantism’s Big Justification Lie

      a careful exposition of how the Protestant doctrine of justification is not only contradicted by Scripture, but is also self-contradictory

      • But then Catholics also believe Peter was their first Pope… because Rock. Never mind geography and the significance of it. If Peter had ever met many of the Popes and the merry band of the Catholic… inner elite, he’d be aghast at all the multiple ongoing apostasies.

        Anyhow, I never did believe in organized religion and all it’s various flavor of denominations, including Poping and indulgences.

        Anyhow, word:

        Let no one deceive or beguile you in any way, for that day will not come except the apostasy comes first [unless the predicted great falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come], and the man of lawlessness (sin) is revealed, who is the son of doom (of perdition), Who opposes and exalts himself so proudly and insolently against and over all that is called God or that is worshiped, [even to his actually] taking his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming that he himself is God.

        Anyhow, for what should be obvious reasons, I am not a Catholic, nor a Protestant. So what is your point?